New onset refractory status epilepticus: Long-term outcomes beyond seizures
- PMID: 39825688
- PMCID: PMC11997932
- DOI: 10.1111/epi.18267
New onset refractory status epilepticus: Long-term outcomes beyond seizures
Abstract
We propose and prioritize important outcome domains that should be considered for future research investigating long-term outcomes (LTO) after new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). The study was led by the international NORSE Institute LTO Working Group. First, literature describing the LTO of NORSE survivors was identified using a PubMed search and summarized to identify knowledge gaps. Subsequently, a consensus-building process was performed to prioritize and rank important LTO domains for further research. The prioritization of LTO domains was qualitative, enabling the expert panel to generate ideas, share opinions, and provide reasons for the rankings. A second round took place to allow expansion and agreement regarding specific details for each domain. Outcomes were classified into eight main domains: (1) Function: Neuropsychological, Neurological (other than seizures), and Psychiatric (mood and behavior); (2) Quality of Life; (3) Epilepsy; (4) Nonneurological (medical); (5) Social; (6) Caregiver Burden; (7) Long-Term Mortality; and (8) Health Care System Impact. In addition, the working group suggested obtaining outcome measures for each domain at 6 months and 1 year after discharge and annually thereafter until stability has been reached. There are no currently established time frames set for when LTO in NORSE begin or plateau, and previously there existed no consensus regarding which LTO should be considered. This consensus process identifies and recommends NORSE LTO domains that should be considered in future research studies to provide more consistent results that can be compared between studies. Survivors of NORSE should be evaluated serially and at fixed points over time to maximize our understanding of the recovery trajectory for all LTO domains. Establishing reliable and standardized data describing LTO (beyond seizures) after NORSE will support discussions with families during the acute stages, prognostication, the development of targeted management strategies for survivors, and future comparative research globally helping to identify biomarkers that may predict LTO.
Keywords: FIRES; NORSE; epilepsy; neuropsychological; psychiatric; quality of life.
© 2025 The Author(s). Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.
Conflict of interest statement
T.E.G. has received support from the Robert N. Kohn NORSE Family Registry Memorial Research Fund and from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Lawson Internal Research Fund, and Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario for unrelated research. M.C.C. has received support from the Johns Hopkins Center for Refractory Status Epilepticus and Neuroinflammation; has served as a paid consultant for Nutricia/Danone, Vitaflo/Nestle Health Science; and has received honoraria from Nutricia/Danone, Vitaflo/Nestle Health Science and royalties from Demos Health/Springer Publishing Company during the period of the research activity and generation of the current report. A.H. has received support from the Paratonnerre Association, the Swebilius Foundation, the Servier Institute, the Philippe Foundation, and the NORSE Institute for NORSE‐Related Research. H.A.H. has received support from the NORSE Institute Medical as an advisory board member, Springer Publishing, and UpToDate (research funding: NINDS R21NS137117 and NCATS UG3TR004501‐01A1). S.‐T.L. has received support from Roche/Genentech (steering committee), Advanced Neural Technologies (advisory board), GC Pharma, and Celltrion, outside the submitted work. A.S. has received support from Angelini Pharma, Biocodex, Desitin Arzneimittel, Eisai, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, UCB Pharma, and UNEEG medical. C.M.Sh. has received support from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation. C.S. has received support from the Epilepsy Study Consortium for work provided to Alterity, Baergic, Biogen, BioXcel, Cerebral, Cerevel, Eliem, Equilibre, Janssen, Longboard, Lundbeck, Marinus, NeuCyte, Neurocrine, Neuroelectrics, Ono, SK Life Science, and UCB; grants from NINDS, AES, UCB, and Parekh Centre for Interdisciplinary Neurology outside the submitted work; speakers bureau fees on behalf of SK Life Sciences and Neurelis; and fees for editorial work for Dynamed. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest. No funding was received to directly support this article. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
References
-
- Kantanen AM, Reinikainen M, Parviainen I, Kälviäinen R. Long‐term outcome of refractory status epilepticus in adults: a retrospective population‐based study. Epilepsy Res. 2017;133:13–21. - PubMed
-
- Kilbride RD, Reynolds AS, Szaflarski JP, Hirsch LJ. Clinical outcomes following prolonged refractory status epilepticus (PRSE). Neurocrit Care. 2013;18(3):374–385. - PubMed
-
- Claassen J, Hirsch J, Emerson G, Mayer SA. Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with pentobarbital, propofol, or midazolam: a systematic review. Epilepsia. 2002;43(2):146–153. - PubMed
-
- Hirsch LJ, Gaspard N, van Baalen A, Nabbout R, Demeret S, Loddenkemper T, et al. Proposed consensus definitions for new‐onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), febrile infection‐related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and related conditions. Epilepsia. 2018;59(4):739–744. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
