Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;49(3):541-548.
doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06406-6. Epub 2025 Jan 18.

Neck shaft angle deviation in patients undergoing femoral limb lengthening, a retrospective study

Affiliations

Neck shaft angle deviation in patients undergoing femoral limb lengthening, a retrospective study

Akram Al Ramlawi et al. Int Orthop. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: Previous studies have shown that subtrochanteric femoral fractures treated with intramedullary nails might lead to varus-procurvatum malalignment. Similar results have been reported when using antegrade intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs). The purpose of our study is to examine if antegrade telescoping intramedullary lengthening nails lead to varus-procurvatum malalignment of the proximal femur and what are possible predictors of that shift.

Methods: In this retrospective, single centre study, five surgeons performed 537 femoral ILN. 347 antegrade PRECICE nails were selected after applying exclusion criteria. The following exclusion criteria were applied, intentional angular deformity correction, retrograde femoral lengthening and concomitant tibial lengthening. After further exclusion criteria were applied, we retrospectively inspected 201 PRECICE nails inserted in 158 paediatric and adult patients (average age 19.9 years) that underwent IM nail limb lengthening. Follow-up was at least one year by which time all osteotomies were healed.

Results: Mean lengthening was 4.7 cm per lengthening surgery with some patients needing multiple lengthening for large discrepancies. Of the 201 nails, trochanteric entry was used in 127 procedures and piriformis entry was used in 74 of them. With pre-op Osteotomy Level Coefficient (OLC) of 0.3. The preoperative neck shaft angle (NSA) was significantly reduced from 130.6 to 127.4 degrees at the end of lengthening (P < 0.05). There was no discernible correlation between the OLC and change in NSA. The trochanteric entry point was associated with a greater tendency to reduce the NSA (Mdif = -4.1, SD = 6.5) as compared to the piriformis entry point (Mdif = -3, SD 6.4) (P < 0.05). No significant change in anatomic medial proximal femoral angle (aMPFA) was noted between pre- and postoperative time points, nor between trochanteric and piriformis entry groups.

Conclusion: Our study investigated the risk of iatrogenic varus deformity of the proximal femur following intramedullary limb lengthening procedures. We identified the osteotomy site as the most significant risk factor for developing iatrogenic varus, while the nail insertion point did not significantly predict this complication, showing comparable results for both trochanteric and piriformis entry points. Additionally, our study is the first to identify a correlation between the level of osteotomy and coxa-valga correction. We hypothesize that a higher osteotomy level might be beneficial for patients undergoing limb lengthening who also present with coxa-valga deformity.

Level of evidence: IV.

Keywords: Coxa vara; Femoral neck shaft; Femur; Intramedullary nail; Limb lengthening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Human ethics statement: Institution IRB determined that this project is exempt from the requirements of the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations for the protection of human subjects. Hence no patient consent was needed. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hafez M, Nicolaou N, Offiah A et al (2022) Femoral lengthening in Children—A comparison between magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening nails and External Fixators. J Pediatr Orthop 42:e290. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000002039 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop 81–104
    1. Birch JG (2017) A brief history of Limb Lengthening. J Pediatr Orthop 37:S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hosny GA (2020) Limb lengthening history, evolution, complications and current concepts. J Orthop Traumatol off J Ital Soc Orthop Traumatol 21:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-019-0541-3 - DOI
    1. Kirane YM, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR (2014) Precision of the PRECICE® Internal bone lengthening nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3869–3878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3575-0 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources