Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jan 18;26(1):64.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08329-0.

Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study

Jaap L J Hanssen  1 , Henrica M J van der Linden  2 , Martha T van der Beek  3 , Robert J P van der Wal  2 , Marco F Termaat  4 , Mark G J de Boer  5   6 , Henk Scheper  5
Affiliations
Observational Study

Implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions on the management of complex bone and joint infections: an observational study

Jaap L J Hanssen et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Multidisciplinary team (MDT) management of prosthetic joint infections (PJI) and other bone and joint infections (BJI) is increasingly put into practice. However, studies evaluating the performance of MDTs in this field are scarce. We aimed to assess our MDT for complex BJI by determining the implementation rate of team decisions, analyzing factors associated with non-implementation and evaluating the clinical outcome of patients in whom MDT decisions were not implemented.

Methods: An observational study was conducted on all patients with a PJI or other BJI of which the management was discussed during MDT meetings between 2015 and 2022 in a tertiary care academic hospital. Patient characteristics and MDT data were obtained from electronic patient records. The multidisciplinary team consisted of orthopaedic surgeons, trauma surgeons, infectious diseases specialists and clinical microbiologists. A decision was considered not implemented if the patient did not receive the management that was decided by the MDT. Factors possibly associated with non-implementation were statistically analyzed using logistic regression.

Results: The analysis included 1321 MDT decisions on 509 patients. The overall implementation rate of MDT decisions was 92%. Reasons for non-implementation were disagreement by the treating surgeon with the MDT regarding the optimal treatment (n = 24, 23%), patient preference for a different treatment (n = 19, 18%), new clinical information not yet available during the MDT meeting that made the physician change management (n = 17, 16%) or unknown (n = 45, 43%). Trauma surgeons were more likely to not implement an MDT decision (odds ratio 2.4, p = 0.01) The cure rate of patients who received a different surgical strategy than decided by the MDT was 33%. The cure rate was lower if a patient chose to deviate from the MDT decision (46%) than when the treating physician chose to deviate from the MDT decision (77%).

Conclusion: The implementation rate of decisions made by our complex BJI MDT was high. Furthermore, the current study suggests that non-implementation of MDT decisions on surgical management and non-implementation initiated by the patient lead to poor clinical outcomes. An analysis of MDT decision implementation is a useful tool to evaluate the impact of MDTs and further improve its quality.

Keywords: Bone and joint infections; Multidisciplinary care; Prosthetic joint infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendment. The study was approved and informed consent waived by the local institutional review board through the scientific committee of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre (W.22.001). Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reasons of non-implementation of multidisciplinary team decisions for bone and joint infections
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Govaert GAM, Termaat MF, Glaudemans A, Geurts JAP, de Jong T, de Jong VM et al. [Diagnosis and treatment of fracture-related infections]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2019;163. - PubMed
    1. Kalson NS, Mathews JA, Alvand A, Morgan-Jones R, Jenkins N, Phillips JRA, et al. Investigation and management of prosthetic joint infection in knee replacement: a BASK Surgical Practice Guideline. Knee. 2020;27(6):1857–65. - PubMed
    1. Walter N, Rupp M, Baertl S, Alt V. The role of multidisciplinary teams in musculoskeletal infection. Bone Joint Res. 2022;11(1):6–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Ieso PB, Coward JI, Letsa I, Schick U, Nandhabalan M, Frentzas S, et al. A study of the decision outcomes and financial costs of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in oncology. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(9):2295–300. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Awad F, Searle D, Walmsley K, Dyar N, Auckland C, Bethune R, et al. The Exeter Knee Infection Multi Disciplinary Team approach to managing prosthetic knee infections: a qualitative analysis. J Orthop. 2020;18:86–90. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources