Measurement Invariance on the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS) by Age and Reporter Status: Comparing ARFID Symptoms Among Self-Reporting Adults and Adolescents and Parent Reports of Children and Adolescents
- PMID: 39829155
- DOI: 10.1002/eat.24381
Measurement Invariance on the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen (NIAS) by Age and Reporter Status: Comparing ARFID Symptoms Among Self-Reporting Adults and Adolescents and Parent Reports of Children and Adolescents
Abstract
Objective: Self-report measures of ARFID symptoms (e.g., Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen [NIAS]) are used to assess symptom differences between groups. Measurement invariance techniques clarify if groups interpret a measure similarly, providing a foundation for examining group differences. Considering age and reporter status (e.g., parent vs. self-report), we investigated measurement invariance of the NIAS in (1) self-reporting adults vs. adolescents; (2) parent reports on children vs. adolescents; and (3) parent reports on adolescents vs. adolescent self-report. If measurement invariance was supported, we examined symptom differences.
Methods: Data were from the ARFID Genes and Environment (ARFID-GEN) project.
Results: Self-reporting adults vs. adolescents and parent reports of adolescents vs. adolescent self-report interpreted the NIAS similarly (measurement invariance was supported). Measurement invariance was not supported in parent reports on children vs. adolescents. Self-reporting adults reported higher appetite scores (i.e., lower appetite) than self-reporting adolescents at the subscale and item level on the NIAS. Although no subscales differences were identified between parent reports on adolescents and adolescent self-reports, parents reported more picky eating and lower appetite in adolescents than self-reporting adolescents at the item level on the NIAS.
Discussion: Findings support using the NIAS to measure symptom differences in self-reporting adults vs. adolescents and in parent reports of adolescents vs. adolescent self-reports. Findings may be leveraged by researchers interested in maturational effects of ARFID symptoms in adolescents and adults via self-reports on the NIAS and clinicians interested in tracking the convergence of parent and adolescent NIAS reports while undergoing treatment for ARFID.
Keywords: ARFID; NIAS; United States; age; measurement invariance; reporter status.
© 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fifth ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
-
- Ban, K. F., V. M. Hazzard, H. F. Zickgraf, and S. M. O'Connor. 2024. “Examining Measurement Invariance of Appetitive Trait and ARFID Symptom Measures by Food Security Status.” Appetite 197: 107304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2024.107304.
-
- Billman Miller, M. G., H. F. Zickgraf, H. B. Murray, J. H. Essayli, and S. E. Lane‐Loney. 2023. “Validation of the Youth‐Nine Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Screen.” European Eating Disorders Review 32, no. 1: 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.3017.
-
- Brosig, L., D. Düplois, A. Hiemisch, et al. 2023. “Birth‐Related, Medical, and Diagnostic Characteristics in Younger Versus Older Children With Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID).” Journal of Eating Disorders 11, no. 1: 190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337‐023‐00908‐7.
-
- Bryant‐Waugh, R., C. M. Stern, M. J. Dreier, et al. 2022. “Preliminary Validation of the Pica, ARFID and Rumination Disorder Interview ARFID Questionnaire (PARDI‐AR‐Q).” Journal of Eating Disorders 10, no. 1: 179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337‐022‐00706‐7.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
