Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 17;16(3):1037-1048.
doi: 10.1039/d4md00788c. eCollection 2025 Mar 19.

Prodrugs and their activation mechanisms for brain drug delivery

Affiliations
Review

Prodrugs and their activation mechanisms for brain drug delivery

Ida Aaberg Lillethorup et al. RSC Med Chem. .

Abstract

Prodrugs are masked drugs that first become pharmacologically active after undergoing a structural change in vivo. They are designed to improve physicochemical/biopharmaceutical drug properties and increase site specificity. The prodrug approach is important when developing brain-targeting drugs due to the presence of the brain barriers that seriously limit the brain entry of highly polar, multifunctional drug entities. While several excellent reviews summarize the structural modifications facilitating transport across the brain barriers, a summary of mechanisms used for the activation of the prodrug in the brain is missing. Given the high need for innovative discoveries in brain drug development, we here review the most important tools being developed since 2000 for CNS prodrug activation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Graphical illustration of the prodrug design for brain disorders. Created in https://BioRender.com.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. The ester prodrug design is compromised by esterase in the periphery and/or unspecific hydrolysis. Created in https://BioRender.com.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Ester prodrugs containing a larger and/or branched alkyl ester show better BBB penetration and lower unspecific hydrolysis. Inspired from ref and . Created partly in https://BioRender.com.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Although the LAT1 targeting perforin inhibitor prodrug showed improved brain uptake of the prodrug, the unspecific bioconversion reduces the brain specificity. Inspired from ref. . Created partly in https://BioRender.com.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Aminopeptidase B is responsible for the bioconversion of the majority of the aromatic amino acid prodrugs targeting LAT1. Blue represents the drug while green/orange/red represent the LAT-1 recognition parts. Inspired from ref. .
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Linear, rod-like N-methylamides are good substrates for the brain-selective enzyme FAAH. Inspired from ref. .
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. NAD(P)H-dependent short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) bioconversion of the prodrugs DHED/α-DHED to the active drugs E2/α-E2. Inspired from ref. and .
Fig. 8
Fig. 8. NAD(P)H-dependent NAD(P)H/quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1) bioconversion of a bexarotene prodrug. Inspired from ref. .
Fig. 9
Fig. 9. The AChEI rivastigmine and tacrine inspired prodrugs: in vivo redox activation initiates a structural rearrangement to form active AChEIs. Inspired from ref. and . Created partly in https://BioRender.com.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10. Dual reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive prodrug leading to the release of two drugs after 1,6-elimination. Inspired from ref. .
Fig. 11
Fig. 11. Graphical illustration of the “lock-in the brain” prodrug design. Created in https://BioRender.com.
Fig. 12
Fig. 12. Replacing the His or PGlu in the tripeptide TRH with substituted pyridinium leads to increased uptake in the brain due to the ‘lock’ in effect. Inspired from ref. and . Created partly in https://BioRender.com.
Fig. 13
Fig. 13. “Lock-in the brain” design based on the 1,4-dihydroquinoline system combined with a cyclization spacer. Inspired from ref. . Created partly in https://BioRender.com.
Fig. 14
Fig. 14. “Lock-in the brain” design based on the disulfide to thiamine conversion. Inspired from ref. and . Created partly in https://BioRender.com.
None
Ida Aaberg Lillethorup
None
Andreas Victor Hemmingsen
None
Katrine Qvortrup

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rautio J. Meanwell N. A. Di L. Hageman M. J. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2018;17:559–587. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.46. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ettmayer P. Amidon G. L. Clement B. Testa B. J. Med. Chem. 2004;47:2393–2404. doi: 10.1021/jm0303812. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yanni S. and Thakker D. R., in Prodrugs: Challenges and Rewards Part 1, ed. V. J. Stella, R. T. Borchardt, M. J. Hageman, R. Oliyai, H. Maag and J. W. Tilley, Springer New York, 2007, pp. 1043–1081
    1. Albert A. Nature. 1958;182:421–423. doi: 10.1038/182421a0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pavan B. Dalpiaz A. Ciliberti N. Biondi C. Manfredini S. Vertuani S. Molecules. 2008;13:1035–1065. doi: 10.3390/molecules13051035. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources