Intensified Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed, Localized Skeletal Ewing Sarcoma (ISG/AIEOP EW-1): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3, Non-Inferiority Trial
- PMID: 39833645
- DOI: 10.1002/pbc.31551
Intensified Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed, Localized Skeletal Ewing Sarcoma (ISG/AIEOP EW-1): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3, Non-Inferiority Trial
Abstract
Background: Several studies have shown that the intensity of treatment in Ewing sarcoma has an impact on outcome. The present trial tested the non-inferiority of intensive, shorter, induction chemotherapy (25 weeks total treatment time) compared to the standard treatment (37 weeks) in non-metastatic Ewing sarcoma (ES) at onset.
Procedure: This national, multicenter, parallel, randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority, phase III trial was conducted in 14 specialized hospitals in Italy. Patients aged 2-40 years with newly diagnosed localized ES were randomized to receive four courses of induction therapy (one every 21 days) either with a standard arm (Arm A) or with an intensive arm (Arm B). For consolidation therapy, good responders (GRs) in Arm A received nine courses (37 weeks), while Arm B patients received five courses (25 weeks). Poor responders for both arms received four courses followed by high-dose busulfan/melphalan + autologous stem cell rescue. Follow-up was 5 years.
Results: In the study period 2009-2018, 274 patients with ES at onset were screened, 248 were eligible, 15 refused randomization, and 233 were randomized (Arm A: 113; Arm B: 120). Median age was 14 years. Arm B was not inferior to Arm A: 5-year EFS was 77.5% and 71.6%, respectively (HR vs. Arm A: 0.74, 90% CI: 0.49-1.14). GRs were 54.9% in Arm A and 62.5% in Arm B. Hematological, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular Grade ≥3 toxicities had higher frequencies in Arm B.
Conclusions: Intensive induction therapy showed non-inferiority in 5-year EFS when compared with the standard induction therapy. Higher toxicity was reported in Arm B with similar outcome, counterbalanced in GRs with a shorter treatment plan.
Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT02063022.
Keywords: Ewing sarcoma; bone tumors; induction chemotherapy; intensification; localized.
© 2025 The Author(s). Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
-
- A. S. Pappo and D. U. Rhabdomyosarcoma, “Ewing Sarcoma, and Other Round Cell Sarcomas,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 36 (2018): 168–179.
-
- S. J. Strauss, A. M. Frezza, N. Abecassis, et al., “Bone Sarcomas: ESMO–EURACAN–GENTURIS–ERN PaedCan Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow‐Up,” Annals of Oncology 32, no. 12 (2021): 1520–1536.
-
- R. G. Maki, P. J. Grohar, and C. R. Antonescu, “Ewing Sarcoma and Related FET family Translocation‐Associated Round Cell Tumors: A Century of Clinical and Scientific Progress,” Genes, Chromosomes & Cancer 61, no. 8 (2022): 509–517.
-
- N. Gaspar, D. S. Hawkins, U. Dirksen, et al., “Ewing Sarcoma: Current Management and Future Approaches Through Collaboration,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 33, no. 27 (2015): 3036–3046.
-
- S. E. Bosma, A. J. Rueten‐Budde, C. Lancia, et al., “Individual Risk Evaluation for Local Recurrence and Distant Metastasis in Ewing Sarcoma: A Multistate Model: A Multistate Model for Ewing Sarcoma,” Pediatric Blood & Cancer 66, no. 11 (2019): e27943.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
