Factors associated with health-related quality of life in women with paid work at breast cancer diagnosis: a German repeated cross-sectional study over the first five years after primary surgery
- PMID: 39833718
- PMCID: PMC11745005
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13491-8
Factors associated with health-related quality of life in women with paid work at breast cancer diagnosis: a German repeated cross-sectional study over the first five years after primary surgery
Abstract
Background: Evidence suggests a deterioration of health-related quality of life (HRQL) after breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. This study examines sociodemographic and health-related factors that could be associated with the HRQL of working women with breast cancer during the first five years after primary surgery. Second, it explores potential vulnerable groups with respect to HRQL using decision tree analyses.
Methods: Women diagnosed with breast cancer who had paid work at diagnosis were recruited at 11 breast cancer centers in the Hannover region, Germany, after primary surgery. Assessments took place four times. 455 patients completed mailed questionnaires at 3 weeks after primary surgery. Women were followed up at 6 months, 1 year and on average 5 years after primary surgery. The physical and mental wellbeing dimensions of HRQL were examined through the Short-Form health survey-12. Potential associations between HRQL and health and sociodemographic factors were examined using multiple linear regression. Classification tree analyses were applied to define specific vulnerable groups.
Results: Mastectomy (ß=-2.49; CI:-4.67, -0.30) and chemotherapy (ß=-4.25; CI:-7.04, -1.46) as health related factors were significantly associated with poorer physical wellbeing at 3 weeks and 6 months after primary surgery, respectively. Returning to work (RTW) after having been on sick leave was strongly associated with better HRQL as illustrated by higher sum scores for physical (at 3 weeks: ß=6.21; CI:3.36, 9.05; at 6 months: ß=5.40; CI:3.01, 1.80; at 1 year: ß=8.40; CI:5.31, 11.49) and mental wellbeing (at 6 months: ß=6.03; CI:33.25, 8.81; at 1 year: ß=7.71; CI:4.85, 10.58) until 1 year after primary surgery. However, its significant effect was no more apparent at 5 years after primary surgery. At that stage, income was mostly associated with physical (ß=0.002; CI:0.0002, 0.003) and mental wellbeing (ß=0.002; CI:0.0005, 0.003) with higher summary scores for higher income especially in women aged ≤ 61 years. In addition, living with a partner appeared to be an important positively associated factor with better mental wellbeing in women with breast cancer (at 6 months: ß=3.68; CI: 0.72, 6.63; at 5 years: ß=2.85; CI:0.39, 5.32) and the first splitting node that defined vulnerability at 5 years.
Conclusions: HRQL in breast cancer appears to be a multidimensional phenomenon associated with disease, treatment and social factors. A special focus should be drawn to women with lower income and those not living with a partner when planning rehabilitation programs and strategies that aim to improve the long term HRQL in breast cancer. As RTW appeared to be positively associated with HRQL, future research should examine potential causal relationships between RTW and HRQL in breast cancer in order to provide evidence needed to plan prevention strategies that aim to improve HRQL after breast cancer.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Quality of life; Return to work; Short-form health survey; Socioeconomic factors.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Hanover Medical School under the number 2973 − 2015. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Participants provided informed consent: In our data protection declaration, we pointed out that participation was voluntary and that there were no negative consequences for non-participation. Respondents received the declaration in the written invitation to the survey.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184. Dan Med Bull. 2010. PMID: 20816024
-
Patient-reported outcomes predict return to work and health-related quality of life six months after cardiac rehabilitation: Results from a German multi-centre registry (OutCaRe).PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232752. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32369514 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
ICF, quality of life, and depression in breast cancer: perceived disability in disease-free women 6 months after mastectomy.Support Care Cancer. 2013 Sep;21(9):2453-60. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1794-7. Epub 2013 Apr 19. Support Care Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23604452
-
Sociodemographic and disease-related determinants of return to work among women with breast cancer: a German longitudinal cohort study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3768-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 30594181 Free PMC article.
-
Factors of decisive importance for being in work or not during two years after breast cancer surgery: content analysis of 462 women's open answers.BMC Womens Health. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):332. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01468-1. BMC Womens Health. 2021. PMID: 34521383 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Benson JR, Jatoi I. The global breast cancer burden. Future Oncol. 2012;8(6):697–702. - PubMed
-
- WHO, Breast cancer WHO. 2018 [2018 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/breast-cancer/en/
-
- Center for cancer registry. Breast Cancer 2016 [18 April 2019]. Available from: https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/EN/Content/Cancer_sites/Breast_cancer/br...
-
- DeSantis CE, Bray F, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Anderson BO, Jemal A. International Variation in female breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24(10):1495–506. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials