Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):44.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07123-5.

International expert consensus on micronutrient supplement use during the early life course

Irene Cetin  1   2 , Roland Devlieger  3   4 , Erika Isolauri  5 , Rima Obeid  6 , Francesca Parisi  1   2 , Stefan Pilz  7 , Lenie van Rossem  8   9 ; Maternal Nutrition Delphi Study Group; Régine Steegers-Theunissen  10
Affiliations

International expert consensus on micronutrient supplement use during the early life course

Irene Cetin et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Growing evidence demonstrates that maternal nutrition is crucial for the health of the mother-to-be, and early life course of the offspring. However, for most micronutrients, guidelines are inconsistent. This Delphi study aimed to investigate the level of expert consensus on maternal nutrition and micronutrient needs during preconception, pregnancy and lactation.

Methods: We conducted a two-round web-based Delphi survey on various topics including general approaches to diet and supplement use, and existing guidelines. For the periods of preconception, pregnancy and lactation, questions focused on the importance and strength of evidence for supplement use with the following micronutrients for low- and high-risk populations: folic acid, choline, iodine, magnesium, calcium, iron, selenium, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and vitamins B1, B2, B6, B12, D and K.

Results: Thirty-five experts participated in the panel, who were healthcare professionals (HCPs), researchers and joint HCP-researchers with expertise in nutrition, gynaecology and/or obstetrics. Panellists reached consensus on the importance of diet and dietary supplement use during pregnancy and agreed on the lack of clarity and consistency in current guidelines, and the need for education in these areas for HCPs, pregnant people and the general population. For general low-risk populations, there was consensus on the importance of supplement use with iron and vitamin D from preconception through lactation, with folic acid and iodine from preconception through the second and third trimesters, respectively, with DHA from the first trimester through lactation and with calcium during lactation. Panellists agreed that the evidence for supplement use with each of these micronutrients during these phases to improve outcomes and/or foetal development is strong, except for vitamin D (preconception), DHA (first trimester), and iron (both periods). There was also consensus that supplement use advice should be tailored for people following vegan/vegetarian diets, restricted diets due to food intolerances, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and previous nutrition-related pregnancy complications.

Conclusion: The findings revealed robust consensus on various aspects of maternal nutrition, including the need for education, the lack of consistency in current guidelines on supplement use, the importance of supplement use across specific phases of pregnancy and the at-risk groups requiring tailored approaches.

Keywords: Guidelines; Lactation; Maternal diet; Preconception; Pregnancy; Trace-elements; Vitamins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study was reviewed by Pearl Institutional Review Board (2023-0047, https://www.pearlirb.com/ ) and received a Category 2 exemption from full review, in accordance with the US Department of Health and Human Services and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR; 45 CFR 46.104(d)(2)). Participants gave informed consent to participate as part of the survey and could withdraw at any time. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: IC has received payments/honoraria unrelated to the present publication from Procter & Gamble (P&G), Bayer and Italfarmaco and has participated on a data safety monitoring board/advisory board for Italfarmaco. RD has received payments/honoraria unrelated to the present publication from P&G and Metagenics and participated on a data safety monitoring board/advisory board for Pfizer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. RO and SP have received consulting fees and payments/honoraria unrelated to the present publication from P&G. All authors received payment for participation in a steering committee meeting related to the data presented in this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of modified Delphi process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Micro- and macro-nutrients for which consensus was reached on supplement use. *Percentages represent the proportion of panellists selecting 1–3 on a 7-point Likert scale of importance for questions on the importance of supplement use. †n refers to the number of valid responses; ‘NA/unsure’ responses were considered invalid and excluded. ‡Percentages represent the proportion of panellists selecting 1–3 on a 7-point Likert scale of strength for questions on the strength of evidence that supplement use improves outcomes and/or foetal development. §Based on data from Survey 2; questions reaching close consensus in Survey 1 were repeated in Survey 2. DHA, docosahexaenoic acid
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Micro- and macro-nutrients for which consensus was not reached on supplement use. *Percentages represent the proportion of panellists selecting 1–3 on a 7-point Likert scale of importance for questions on the importance of supplement use. †n refers to the number of valid responses; ‘NA/unsure’ responses were considered invalid and excluded. ‡Percentages represent the proportion of panellists selecting 1–3 on a 7-point Likert scale of strength for questions on the strength of evidence that supplement use improves outcomes and/or foetal development. §Based on data from Survey 2; questions reaching close consensus in Survey 1 were repeated in Survey 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van Zundert SKM, van Rossem L, Schoenmakers S, Steegers-Theunissen RPM. Lifestyle care for transformation of medical care using an early life course approach. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45:847–50. - PubMed
    1. Berti C, Decsi T, Dykes F, Hermoso M, Koletzko B, Massari M, et al. Critical issues in setting micronutrient recommendations for pregnant women: an insight. Matern Child Nutr. 2010;6:5–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black RE. Micronutrients in pregnancy. Br J Nutr. 2001;85:S193–7. - PubMed
    1. Koletzko B, Bauer CP, Bung P, Cremer M, Flothkotter M, Hellmers C, et al. German national consensus recommendations on nutrition and lifestyle in pregnancy by the ‘Healthy start - Young family network’. Ann Nutr Metab. 2013;63:311–22. - PubMed
    1. Mousa A, Naqash A, Lim S. Macronutrient and micronutrient intake during pregnancy: an overview of recent evidence. Nutrients. 2019;11:443. - PMC - PubMed