No abstract available
Keywords:
co-design; engagement; health services; person-centered; rehabilitation.
PubMed Disclaimer
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Comment on
- Editorial on the Research Topic
Co-design of rehabilitation programming
References
-
-
Slattery P, Saeri AK, Bragge P. Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews. Health Res Policy Syst. (2020) 18(1):17. 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9
-
DOI
-
PMC
-
PubMed
-
-
Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, Fancott C, Bhatia P, Casalino S, et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implement Sci. (2018) 13:1–22. 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z
-
DOI
-
PMC
-
PubMed
-
-
Green T, Bonner A, Teleni L, Bradford N, Purtell L, Douglas C, et al. Use and reporting of experience-based codesign studies in the healthcare setting: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. (2020) 29(1):64–76. 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009570
-
DOI
-
PubMed
-
-
Gainforth HL, Hoekstra F, McKay R, McBride CB, Sweet SN, Ginis KA, et al. Integrated knowledge translation guiding principles for conducting and disseminating spinal cord injury research in partnership. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. (2021) 102(4):656–63. 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.09.393
-
DOI
-
PubMed