Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan-Mar;47(1):e20240075.
doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0075en.

Phosphate binder in dialysis: a cross-sectional study of patients' adherence and pill burden

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

Phosphate binder in dialysis: a cross-sectional study of patients' adherence and pill burden

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Brunelle Bruna Scavello Coelho Ferezin et al. J Bras Nefrol. 2025 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Introduction: Phosphate (P) binders are among the most common medications prescribed to control P levels in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis. There is still a paucity of data on adherence to P binders with no comparison between dialysis modalities.

Methods: We accessed factors associated with P binder adherence among patients on dialysis in an academic hospital. Adherence was calculated as the ratio between the number of pills taken per day as reported and the prescribed number of pills. Patients were considered non-adherent if adherence was at least 20% less or 30% more than prescribed.

Results: Patients (N = 137) were young, mostly women, and on dialysis for a median time of 53 months. Sevelamer and calcium carbonate were prescribed as P binders to 70.8% and 10.2% of patients, respectively, with no difference across dialysis modalities (p = 0.839). P correlated with the number of pills prescribed (r = 0.368, p = 0.001) and the number of pills taken per day (r = 0.275, p = 0.001). Hyperphosphatemia was found in 52 patients (36.4%). Adherence to Ca carbonate and sevelamer was 100% and 68.4%, respectively. Non-adherent patients were women, younger, with higher serum albumin and urea, and lower serum calcium. Logistic regression showed that female sex (HR 3.30, 95% CI: 1.39-7.84, p = 0.007) and hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis (HR 4.55, 95%, CI: 1.26-16.39, p = 0.021) remained independently associated with a non-adherence behavior.

Conclusions: The current study suggests that strategies to increase adherence should be implemented. Whether phosphate binder adherence is associated with better outcomes deserves further investigation.

Introdução:: Quelantes de fosfato (P) estão entre os medicamentos mais comumente prescritos para controlar níveis de P em pacientes com DRC em diálise. Ainda há escassez de dados sobre adesão aos quelantes de P, sem comparações entre modalidades dialíticas.

Métodos:: Acessamos fatores associados à adesão ao quelante de P entre pacientes em diálise em um hospital universitário. A adesão foi calculada como a razão entre número de comprimidos tomados por dia, conforme relatado, e número de comprimidos prescritos. Pacientes foram considerados não aderentes se a adesão fosse ao menos 20% menor ou 30% maior do que o prescrito.

Resultados:: Os pacientes (N = 137) eram jovens, predominantemente mulheres, em diálise por um período mediano de 53 meses. Sevelamer e carbonato de cálcio foram prescritos como quelantes de P para 70,8% e 10,2% dos pacientes, respectivamente, sem diferença entre modalidades dialíticas (p = 0,839). P correlacionou-se com número de comprimidos prescritos (r = 0,368; p = 0,001) e número de comprimidos tomados por dia (r = 0,275; p = 0,001). Encontramos hiperfosfatemia em 52 pacientes (36,4%). A adesão ao carbonato de Ca e sevelamer foi de 100% e 68,4%, respectivamente. Pacientes não aderentes eram mulheres, mais jovens, com albumina e ureia séricas mais elevadas e menor cálcio sérico. A regressão logística mostrou que sexo feminino (HR 3,30; IC 95%: 1,39–7,84; p = 0,007) e hemodiálise vs. diálise peritoneal (HR 4,55; IC 95%: 1,26–16,39; p = 0,021) permaneceram independentemente associados ao comportamento de não adesão.

Conclusão:: O presente estudo sugere que estratégias para aumentar a adesão devem ser implementadas. A relação entre adesão ao quelante de fosfato e melhores desfechos merece investigação mais aprofundada.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Histogram of phosphate distribution.
Figure 2
Figure 2. (A) Difference between the number of phosphate binder pills prescribed and taken per day. Bars represent median values and lines represent the 95% confidence interval. (B) Correlation between the number of phosphate binder pills prescribed and the difference between the number of pills taken minus prescribed.
Figura 1
Figura 1. Histograma da distribuição de fosfato.
Figura 2
Figura 2. (A) Diferença entre o número de comprimidos de quelante de fosfato prescritos e tomados por dia. As barras representam os valores medianos e as linhas representam o intervalo de confiança de 95%. (B) Correlação entre o número de comprimidos de quelante de fosfato prescritos e a diferença entre o número de comprimidos tomados e o prescrito.

Similar articles

References

    1. Copland M, Komenda P, Weinhandl ED, McCullough PA, Morfin JA. Intensive hemodialysis, mineral and bone disorder, and phosphate binder use. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(5):24–32. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ketteler M, Block GA, Evenepoel P, Fukagawa M, Herzog CA, McCann L, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2017 clinical practice guideline update. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(6):422–30. doi: 10.7326/M17-2640. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edmonston DL, Isakova T, Dember LM, Brunelli S, Young A, Brosch R, et al. Design and rationale of hilo: a pragmatic, randomized trial of phosphate management for patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2021;77(6):920–30. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.10.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De S, Geest, Sabate E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003;2(4):323. doi: 10.1016/S1474-5151(03)00091-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee JK, Grace KA, Taylor AJ. Effect of a pharmacy care program on medication adherence and persistence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;296(21):2563–71. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.21.joc60162. - DOI - PubMed