A real-world analysis of antidepressant medications in US veterans aged 60 years and older: a comparative analysis
- PMID: 39836031
- PMCID: PMC11773886
- DOI: 10.57264/cer-2024-0187
A real-world analysis of antidepressant medications in US veterans aged 60 years and older: a comparative analysis
Abstract
Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of antidepressants (AD) among older adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) by assessing treatment change, augmentation and hospitalization rates. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from the Veterans Affairs (VA) database, including 142,138 patients aged ≥60 years diagnosed with MDD. Patients prescribed bupropion, citalopram, duloxetine, escitalopram, fluoxetine, mirtazapine, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine were included. Outcomes were treatment change, augmentation and hospitalization rates. Hazard ratios (aHRs) were calculated using sertraline as the reference. Results: Of the patients, 39.6% required augmentation, 18.1% changed antidepressant treatment and 13.3% were hospitalized. The corresponding incidence rate was 544, 124 and 122 events per 1000 person-years. Compared with sertraline, mirtazapine users had the highest AD change risk (aHR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.29-1.40), while duloxetine users had the lowest (aHR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.92). Duloxetine also had the lowest augmentation risk (aHR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.86-0.92). Mirtazapine users also had the highest risks of augmentation (aHR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.12-1.18) and hospitalization (aHR 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07-1.23). Bupropion had the lowest hospitalization risk (aHR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.84). Conclusion: Antidepressant choice significantly influences treatment outcomes in older adults with MDD. Duloxetine demonstrated the best profile with the lowest risks of AD change and augmentation, while mirtazapine posed the highest risks of all three outcomes. Personalized treatment strategies are crucial to improving outcomes in this population.
Keywords: antidepressants; augmentation; depression; hospitalization; medication changing.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests disclosure
SS Sutton has received research grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, EMD Serono and Alexion Pharmaceuticals, all for projects unrelated to study. SS Sutton, J Magagnoli and TH Cummings disclose support from NIH grant R01DA054992 and the South Carolina Center for Rural and Primary Healthcare for projects unrelated to this study. The authors have no other competing interests or relevant affiliations with any organization/entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
Similar articles
-
Real-World Evidence on Clinical Outcomes of Commonly Used Antidepressants in Older Adults Initiating Antidepressants for Depression: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark.Am J Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 1;181(1):47-56. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230356. Epub 2023 Oct 18. Am J Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 37849303
-
Comparative effectiveness of antidepressants on geriatric depression: Real-world evidence from a population-based study.J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:609-615. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Oct 14. J Affect Disord. 2022. PMID: 34655698 Clinical Trial.
-
Antidepressant agents and suicide death among US Department of Veterans Affairs patients in depression treatment.J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Jun;32(3):346-53. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182539f11. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012. PMID: 22544011 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 12 new-generation antidepressants: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):746-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60046-5. Lancet. 2009. PMID: 19185342 Review.
-
Gastrointestinal side effects associated with antidepressant treatments in patients with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 13;109:110266. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110266. Epub 2021 Feb 5. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 33549697
Cited by
-
Delving into the Perception, Use, and Context of Duloxetine in Clinical Practice: An Analysis Based on the Experience of Healthcare Professionals.Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):757. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15070757. Brain Sci. 2025. PMID: 40722347 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andrews G. Reducing the burden of depression. Can. J. Psychiatry 53(7), 420–427 (2008). - PubMed
-
- Herrman H, Kieling C, McGorry P et al. Reducing the global burden of depression: a Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission. Lancet 394(10193), 1553–1554 (2019). - PubMed
-
- Health NIoM. Major Depression 2023 [cited 2024]. Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2021-nsduh-annual-national-report
-
- Greenberg P, Chitnis A, Louie D et al. The economic burden of adults with major depressive disorder in the United States (2019). Adv. Ther. 40(10), 4460–4479 (2023). - PMC - PubMed
-
• Highlights the significant economic burden of major depressive disorder (MDD) in the USA, emphasizing the importance of improving treatment outcomes to reduce healthcare costs.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical