A framework for flow time measured by Doppler ultrasound
- PMID: 39836314
- PMCID: PMC11751365
- DOI: 10.1186/s13089-025-00414-8
A framework for flow time measured by Doppler ultrasound
Abstract
The duration of mechanical systole-also termed the flow time (FT) or left ventricular ejection time (LVET)-is measured by Doppler ultrasound and increasingly used as a stroke volume (SV) surrogate to guide patient care. Nevertheless, confusion exists as to the determinants of FT and a critical evaluation of this measure is needed. Using Doppler ultrasound of the left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT VTI) as well as strain and strain rate echocardiography as grounding principles, this brief commentary offers a model for the independent influences of FT. This framework establishes that systolic duration is directly proportional to the distance traversed by a single cardiac myocyte and indirectly proportional to its shortening velocity. Grossly, this translates to a direct relationship between FT and the LVOT VTI (i.e., SV) and an indirect relationship with mean ejection velocity. Thus, changes in the systolic time can infer SV change, so long as other cardiac parameters are considered.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: JESK is the co-founder and chief medical officer of Flosonics Medical.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The left ventricular outflow tract and carotid artery velocity time integrals.Front Med Technol. 2024 Jan 24;6:1320810. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1320810. eCollection 2024. Front Med Technol. 2024. PMID: 38333734 Free PMC article.
-
Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral outperforms ejection fraction and Doppler-derived cardiac output for predicting outcomes in a select advanced heart failure cohort.Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017 Jul 3;15(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12947-017-0109-4. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017. PMID: 28673293 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale for using the velocity-time integral and the minute distance for assessing the stroke volume and cardiac output in point-of-care settings.Ultrasound J. 2020 Apr 21;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00170-x. Ultrasound J. 2020. PMID: 32318842 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reference intervals and percentile curve for left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), velocity time integral (VTI), and LVOT-VTI-derived hemodynamic parameters in healthy children and adolescents: Analysis of echocardiographic methods association and agreement.Echocardiography. 2018 Dec;35(12):2014-2034. doi: 10.1111/echo.14176. Epub 2018 Oct 30. Echocardiography. 2018. PMID: 30376592
-
Is There a Correlation Between Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Velocity Time Integral and Stroke Volume Index in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery?Cureus. 2022 Jul 25;14(7):e27257. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27257. eCollection 2022 Jul. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36039242 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Defining the physiological bounds of left ventricular ejection time with a wireless, wearable ultrasound: An analysis of over 137,000 cardiac cycles.Digit Health. 2025 Mar 17;11:20552076251323838. doi: 10.1177/20552076251323838. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40103641 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weissler AM, Peeler RG, Roehll WH Jr (1961) Relationships between left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume, and heart rate in normal individuals and patients with cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 62:367–378 - PubMed
-
- Weissler AM, Harris LC, White GD (1963) Left ventricular ejection time index in man. J Appl Physiol 18:919–923 - PubMed
-
- Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D, Anguel N, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL (2005) Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 31(9):1195–1201 - PubMed
-
- Singer M (2006) The FTc is not an accurate marker of left ventricular preload. Intensive Care Med 32(7):1089 (author reply 1091) - PubMed
-
- Chemla D, Nitenberg A (2006) Systolic duration, preload, and afterload: Is a new paradigm needed? Intensive Care Med 32(9):1454–1455 (author reply 1456–1457) - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources