Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 1;60(8):508-516.
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001153. Epub 2025 Jan 22.

Differentiation of Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque Components With Dual-Energy Computed Tomography

Affiliations

Differentiation of Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque Components With Dual-Energy Computed Tomography

Mueez Aizaz et al. Invest Radiol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Carotid plaque vulnerability is a strong predictor of recurrent ipsilateral stroke, but differentiation of plaque components using conventional computed tomography (CT) is suboptimal. The aim of our study was to evaluate the ability of dual-energy CT (DECT) to characterize atherosclerotic carotid plaque components based on the effective atomic number and effective electron density using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, where possible, histology as the reference standard.

Materials and methods: Patients with recent cerebral ischemia and a ≥2-mm carotid plaque underwent computed tomography angiography and MRI. A subgroup underwent carotid endarterectomy. Trained observers delineated plaque components on histology or MRI, independent of computed tomography angiography. DECT was coregistered with MRI and/or histology. Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), fibrous tissue, and calcifications were delineated on DECT, and ρ eff and Z eff values were determined in the derivation cohort (n = 55). Spatial separation of these components was evaluated in a ρ eff -Z eff -cluster plot. Ranges that optimally differentiate plaque features were determined. For validation, plaque components were quantified in the validation cohort (n = 29) using these ρ eff -Z eff ranges and literature-based Hounsfield unit (HU) ranges and correlated to MRI volumes.

Results: Eighty-four participants (68 ± 8 years; 55 male) were evaluated. In the derivation cohort, plaque components were well separated on the cluster plot, resulting in the following ranges: IPH:ρ eff < 1.15, Z eff < 7.5, LRNC:ρ eff < 1.15, Z eff :7.5-8.75, fibrous tissue:ρ eff < 1.15, Z eff > 8.75, and calcifications: ρ eff > 1.15, Z eff > 0. In the validation cohort, significant correlations were found between ρ eff -Z eff -based and MRI plaque volumes for fibrous tissue ( r = 0.69, P < 0.001), LRNC ( r = 0.94, P < 0.001), IPH ( r = 0.35, P = 0.03), and calcifications ( r = 0.70, P < 0.001). Lower correlations were found between HU-based and MRI plaque volumes for fibrous tissue ( r = 0.40, P = 0.02), LRNC ( r = 0.86, P < 0.001), and calcifications ( r = 0.47, P = 0.005), with no correlation for IPH ( r = 0.02, P = 0.45).

Conclusions: We determined ρ eff -Z eff ranges for plaque assessment. ρ eff -Z eff -based volumes showed strong-to-very strong correlations with MRI for LRNC, fibrous tissue, and calcifications and a weak correlation for IPH. ρ eff -Z eff -based volumes demonstrated superior agreement with MRI for all plaque components compared with HU-based volumes, highlighting the potential of DECT for the identification of patients with vulnerable plaques.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01709045 NCT01208025.

Keywords: carotid atherosclerosis; dual-energy computed tomography; effective atomic number; effective electron density; plaque composition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: No author has any conflict of interest related to this paper. This research was supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation and performed within the framework of the Center for Translational Molecular Medicine, project PARISK (Plaque At RISK; grant number 01C-202).

Similar articles

References

    1. Lindsay MP, Norrving B, Sacco RL, et al. World stroke organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2019. Int J Stroke . 2019;14:806–817.
    1. Cheng SF, Brown MM, Simister RJ, et al. Contemporary prevalence of carotid stenosis in patients presenting with ischaemic stroke. Br J Surg . 2019;106:872–878.
    1. Truijman MT, Kooi ME, van Dijk AC, et al. Plaque At RISK (PARISK): prospective multicenter study to improve diagnosis of high-risk carotid plaques. Int J Stroke . 2014;9:747–754.
    1. Song P, Fang Z, Wang H, et al. Global and regional prevalence, burden, and risk factors for carotid atherosclerosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling study. Lancet Glob Health . 2020;8:e721–e729.
    1. Bos D, Arshi B, van den Bouwhuijsen QJA, et al. Atherosclerotic carotid plaque composition and incident stroke and coronary events. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2021;77:1426–1435.

MeSH terms

Associated data