Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Jan;18(1):e014499.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014499. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

Impact of Time to Catheter-Based Therapy on Outcomes in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Impact of Time to Catheter-Based Therapy on Outcomes in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Robert S Zhang et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of early versus delayed catheter-based therapies (CBTs) on clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 2 academic centers involving patients with intermediate-risk PE from January 2020 to January 2024. Patients were divided into early (<12 hours) and delayed CBT (≥12 hours) groups. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability, and 90-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included a composite of 30-day mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and hemodynamic instability. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance covariates.

Results: A total of 133 patients were included (mean age, 58.3 years; 44% women; 29% catheter-directed thrombolysis; 68% mechanical thrombectomy; and 3% both). The median time to intervention was 6.1 hours in the early group and 20.8 hours in the delayed group (P<0.001). A total of 16 patients (12% of patients) experienced the primary composite outcome. Early CBT was associated with a significantly lower rate of the primary composite outcome (4% versus 18%; log-rank P<0.001; inverse probability of treatment weighting [hazard ratio, 0.13 (95% CI, 0.03-0.58); P=0.007]) and secondary composite outcome (0% versus 9%; log-rank P=0.02). The early CBT group also had lower intensive care unit (3.0 versus 3.4 days; P=0.01) and hospital length of stay (5.0 versus 6.1 days; P=0.046). When patients were stratified by timing of CBT (early/late) and the composite PE shock score (high ≥3; low <3), all 16 patients who experienced the primary composite outcome had a high composite PE shock score, with 14/16 (87.5%) having a high composite PE shock score and delayed intervention.

Conclusions: Early CBT was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. The composite PE shock score may help identify patients who will benefit from early CBT. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords: catheters; pulmonary embolism; shock; thrombectomy; thrombosis; time-to-treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Taslakian is a consultant for Advarra and Siemens. Dr Bangalore is on the advisory board of and is a consultant for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, Shockwave, REATA, Inari, Imperial Health, and Argon. The other authors report no conflicts.

Similar articles

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources