Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jan 21;13(1).
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00160. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.

Medialized vs. Lateralized Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kara E Holt  1 , Victoria E Bindi  1 , Timothy R Buchanan  1 , Akshay R Reddy  1 , Abtahi Tishad  1 , Persis Desai  1 , Keegan M Hones  2 , Thomas W Wright  2 , Bradley S Schoch  3 , Joseph J King  2 , Kevin A Hao  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Medialized vs. Lateralized Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kara E Holt et al. JBJS Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is increasingly used in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) with reliable clinical improvement. Lateralized RSA implants have conferred superior outcomes compared with the original Grammont design in patients with nontraumatic indications. However, in the setting of a PHF, lateralized components can place increased tension across the tuberosity fracture site and potentially compromise tuberosity healing and outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine the effect of implant design on clinical outcomes after RSA for PHFs.

Methods: A systematic review was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for clinical studies on RSA performed for PHFs that reported implant manufacturer details. Our primary outcomes included postoperative external rotation (ER), forward elevation (FE), abduction, Constant score, rate of greater tuberosity (GT) healing, and the incidence of complications compared between medialized vs. lateralized global implant design.

Results: Globally lateralized RSA cohorts (478 RSAs total with cumulative lateral offset achieved through humeral or glenoid lateralization or both humeral and glenoid lateralization) were found to have a greater mean postoperative Constant score compared with globally medialized (medialized glenoid and medialized humerus) RSA cohorts with 1,494 total medialized RSAs (66 vs. 59, p = 0.006), but there was no significant difference regarding mean postoperative ER (30° vs. 22°, p = 0.078), FE (117° vs. 119°, p = 0.708), or abduction (103° vs. 107°, p = 0.377). On meta-regression, neither implant design nor tuberosity status significantly influenced postoperative ER, FE, abduction, or Constant score on meta-regression independent of mean follow-up and age at surgery. The rate of GT healing was greater in lateralized compared with medialized RSAs (88% vs. 72%, p < 0.001). On meta-regression, medialized RSA design was associated with a 73% lower odds of GT healing (odds ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.11-0.68, p = 0.007) independent of mean follow-up and age at surgery.

Conclusion: Lateralized RSA implants conferred no significant functional benefit over medialized implants when used in patients with PHFs.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B185).

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Handoll H, Brealey S, Rangan A, Keding A, Corbacho B, Jefferson L, Chuang LH, Goodchild L, Hewitt C, Torgerson D. The ProFHER (PROximal Fracture of the Humerus: Evaluation by Randomisation) trial: a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical compared with non-surgical treatment for proximal fracture of the humerus in adults. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(24):1-280. doi:10.3310/hta19240 - DOI
    1. Hao KA, Patch DA, Reed LA, Spitler CA, Horneff JG, Ahn J, Strelzow JA, Hebert-Davies J, Little MTM, Krause PC, Johnson JP, King JJ. Factors influencing surgical management of proximal humerus fractures: do shoulder and trauma surgeons differ? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(6):e259-69. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2021.11.016 - DOI
    1. Reed LA, Hao KA, Patch DA, King JJ, Fedorka C, Ahn J, Strelzow JA, Hebert-Davies J, Little MTM, Krause PC, Johnson JP, Spitler CA. How do surgeons decide when to treat proximal humerus fractures with operative versus nonoperative management? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(8):3683-91. doi:10.1007/s00590-023-03610-1 - DOI
    1. Bonnevialle N, Tournier C, Clavert P, Ohl X, Sirveaux F, Saragaglia D; la Société française de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique. Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 4-part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: multicenter retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(5):569-73. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2016.02.014 - DOI
    1. Sheibani-Rad S, Kuhn AW, Berrigan PS, Bedi A. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(24):e1353-61. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00166 - DOI