Technology-Based Interventions for Pain in Children Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 39837346
- PMCID: PMC11750321
- DOI: 10.1111/ijn.13322
Technology-Based Interventions for Pain in Children Undergoing Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of technology-based interventions on the pain of paediatric surgery patients.
Background: Recently, the number of technology-based interventions involving multimodal nonpharmacological methods tailored to pain management in paediatric surgery patients has increased. It is crucial to determine the effectiveness of these interventions.
Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials following Cochrane methods was conducted.
Review methods: We performed a literature search in the Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, MEDLINE, ProQuest and Cochrane Library databases. Two independent researchers screened the literature using specific keywords and selected randomized controlled trials based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each researcher extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the randomized controlled trials using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool.
Result: We conducted a meta-analysis on 14 randomized controlled trials included in the study. The results showed that technology-based interventions reduced pain scores in paediatric surgery patients. Cochran's Q test results pointed to a high level of heterogeneity among the randomized controlled trials.
Conclusion: A meta-analysis result of 14 randomized controlled trials showed that technology-based interventions are effective methods for reducing pain in paediatric surgery patients.
Registration number: CRD42021226666.
Keywords: nursing; paediatric surgery; pain; systematic review and meta‐analyses; technology.
© 2025 The Author(s). International Journal of Nursing Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of music ıntervention on breast milk production in breastfeeding mothers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3307-3316. doi: 10.1111/jan.14589. Epub 2020 Oct 10. J Adv Nurs. 2020. PMID: 33037832
-
Lasers efficacy in pain management after primary and secondary endodontic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):26028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74998-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39472604 Free PMC article.
-
Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;17(2):e1173. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1173. eCollection 2021 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 37131927 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of technology-based interventions compared with other non-pharmacological interventions for relieving procedural pain in hospitalized neonates: a systematic review.JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Aug 1;21(8):1549-1581. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00179. JBI Evid Synth. 2023. PMID: 37218335
References
-
- Borenstein, M. , Hedges L. V., Higgins J. P., and Rothstein H. R.. 2011. Introduction to Meta‐Analysis. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical