Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;35(3):1415-1427.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11349-y. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

Prognostic value of CT-based skeletal muscle and adipose tissue mass and quality parameters in patients with liver metastases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing Yttrium-90 radioembolization

Affiliations

Prognostic value of CT-based skeletal muscle and adipose tissue mass and quality parameters in patients with liver metastases and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing Yttrium-90 radioembolization

Yan Zhao et al. Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate baseline patient characteristics associated with the risk of computed tomography (CT)-based sarcopenia and assess whether sarcopenia and other morphometric parameters influence survival outcomes in patients with liver metastases and cholangiocarcinoma after Yttrium-90 radioembolization.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 120 cancer patients (mean age, 62 ± 13.3 years, 61 men) who underwent preprocedural CT. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was measured at the L3 vertebral level to identify sarcopenia. The Cox proportional hazard model was performed to assess the prognostic value of the variables, and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank text was used for overall survival (OS) assessment.

Results: Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 70 patients (58.3%). The multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that male sex, body mass index (BMI), visceral fat radiation attenuation (VFRA), skeletal muscle radiation attenuation (SMRA), and subcutaneous fat radiation attenuation (SFRA) were associated with the incidence of sarcopenia with the odds ratio of 8.81 (95% CI, 2.09-37.1, p = 0.003), 0.64 (95% CI, 0.48-0.85, p = 0.002), 1.23 (95% CI, 1.06-1.42, p = 0.006), 0.79 (95% CI, 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76-0.93, p = 0.001), respectively. Age, skeletal muscle index, and tumor subtypes were independent prognostic factors for OS with the hazard ratio of 1.03 (95% CI, 1.01-1.05, p = 0.01), 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.99, p = 0.021) and 2.09 (95% CI, 1.31-3.33 p = 0.002), respectively. In patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, median OS was significantly longer in the non-sarcopenic group than in the sarcopenic patient (25.9 versus 6.5 months, p = 0.029).

Conclusion: Male sex, BMI, VFRA, SMRA, and SFRA were associated with the incidence of sarcopenia. SMI value could be used as a biomarker for OS in patients treated with Yttrium-90 radioembolization.

Key points: Question The prognostic significance of CT-based sarcopenia and other morphometric parameters in patients with liver metastases and cholangiocarcinoma undergoing Yttrium-90 radioembolization remains unclear. Findings A high skeletal muscle index has been identified as an independent protective factor for overall survival in cancer patients treated with Yttrium-90 radioembolization. Clinical relevance The negative impact of CT-based sarcopenia has been confirmed in the context of Yttrium-90 radioembolization. Clinicians should strive to prevent the progression of sarcopenia or maintain skeletal muscle index in perioperative management.

Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma; Muscle; Prognosis; Sarcopenia; Yttrium-90.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Guarantor: The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Duran Rafael. Conflict of interest: R.D.: Consultant: Guerbet, Boston Scientific/BTG, Medtronic, Terumo. Grant: Guerbet, Boston Scientific/BTG, Society of Interventional Oncology, Siemens Healthineers. AntDi: reports honoraria and/or consulting fees from and has served on advisory boards for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Pharmamar, Incyte, Terumo, Boston Scientific/BTG and AstraZeneca. N.V.: Grant: Boston Scientific, Canon Medical. G.T.: honoraria and/or consulting fees from Boston Scientific. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest. Statistics and biometry: No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper. Informed consent: Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Ethical approval: was obtained from the Institutional Review Board. Study subjects or cohorts overlap: Not applicable. Methodology: Retrospective Observational Performed at one institution

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Computed tomography image (L3) shows the different tissue segmentations after thresholding in a patient with liver metastasis before 90Y-radioembolization. The color-coded areas represent the skeletal muscle area (A), intermuscular adipose tissue area (B), visceral fat area (C), and subcutaneous fat area (D)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Correlation analysis of SMI with BMI, VATI, and VFRA. SMI, skeletal muscle index; BMI, body mass index; VATI, visceral adipose tissue index; VFRA, visceral fat radiation attenuation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot showing factors associated with the risk of sarcopenia. BMI, body mass index; SMRA, skeletal muscle radiation attenuation; SFRA, subcutaneous fat radiation attenuation; SATI, subcutaneous adipose tissue index; VATI, visceral adipose tissue index; VFRA, visceral fat radiation attenuation; IMATI, intramuscular adipose tissue index; BMI, body mass index
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
A The incidence of sarcopenia was significantly lower in the obesity group than in the other groups. B Survival analysis with Kaplan–Meier curves showing median OS among normal/underweight, overweight and obesity groups. **p < 0.01
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Survival analysis. A Overall survival in the whole cohort. B Overall survival in sarcopenic vs. non-sarcopenic patients. C Overall survival of patients with various primary malignant tumors significantly differed among groups
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot of factors associated with overall survival. BMI, body mass index; SMRA, skeletal muscle radiation attenuation; SFRA, subcutaneous fat radiation attenuation; SATI, subcutaneous adipose tissue index; VATI, visceral adipose tissue index; VFRA, visceral fat radiation attenuation; IMATI, intermuscular adipose tissue index; BMI, body mass index

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J et al (2014) Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 15:95–101 - PubMed
    1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA (2019) Sarcopenia. Lancet 393:2636–2646 - PubMed
    1. Morley JE, Anker SD, von Haehling S (2014) Prevalence, incidence, and clinical impact of sarcopenia: facts, numbers, and epidemiology—update 2014. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 5:253–259 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rolland Y, Czerwinski S, Abellan Van Kan G et al (2008) Sarcopenia: its assessment, etiology, pathogenesis, consequences and future perspectives. J Nutr Health Aging 12:433–450 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tijerina AJ (2004) The biochemical basis of metabolism in cancer cachexia. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 23:237–243 - PubMed

MeSH terms