Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 20:16:20417314241308022.
doi: 10.1177/20417314241308022. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.

Innovative bioinks for 3D bioprinting: Exploring technological potential and regulatory challenges

Vidhi Mathur  1 , Prachi Agarwal  1 , Meghana Kasturi  2 , Varadharajan Srinivasan  3 , Raviraja N Seetharam  1 , Kirthanashri S Vasanthan  1
Affiliations
Review

Innovative bioinks for 3D bioprinting: Exploring technological potential and regulatory challenges

Vidhi Mathur et al. J Tissue Eng. .

Abstract

The field of three dimensional (3D) bioprinting has witnessed significant advancements, with bioinks playing a crucial role in enabling the fabrication of complex tissue constructs. This review explores the innovative bioinks that are currently shaping the future of 3D bioprinting, focusing on their composition, functionality, and potential for tissue engineering, drug delivery, and regenerative medicine. The development of bioinks, incorporating natural and synthetic materials, offers unprecedented opportunities for personalized medicine. However, the rapid technological progress raises regulatory challenges regarding safety, standardization, and long-term biocompatibility. This paper addresses these challenges, examining the current regulatory frameworks and the need for updated guidelines to ensure patient safety and product efficacy. By highlighting both the technological potential and regulatory hurdles, this review offers a comprehensive overview of the future landscape of bioinks in bioprinting, emphasizing the necessity for cross-disciplinary collaboration between scientists, clinicians, and regulatory bodies to achieve successful clinical applications.

Keywords: 3D bioprinting; bioinks; biomedical application; crosslinking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of 3D bioprinting process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Selection criteria of Bioink for 3D printing. (This work is licensed under a creative comments attribution 3.0 License, Ref.).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Decellularization of organs.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Different types of protein based bioink.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Crosslinking of collagen.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Cell-based bioinks.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mabrouk M, Beherei HH, Das DB. Recent progress in the fabrication techniques of 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 2020; 110: 110716. - PubMed
    1. Thai TH, Nguyen TM, Truong MD, et al.. Fabrication of 3D PCL/PVP scaffolds using monosodium glutamate as porogen by solvent casting/particulate leaching method for oral and maxillofacial bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 2024; 19(5). DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/ad6ac5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vigani B, Ianev D, Adami M, et al.. Porous functionally graded scaffold prepared by a single-step freeze-drying process. A bioinspired approach for wound care. Int J Pharm 2024; 656: 124119. - PubMed
    1. Azarsa S, Pezeshki-Modaress M, Yazdian F, et al.. Nanofiber/hydrogel composite scaffolds based on alginate sulfate and extracellular matrix for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Process Biochem 2024; 136: 60–71.
    1. Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF. Print me an organ! Why we are not there yet. Prog Polym Sci 2019; 97: 101145.

LinkOut - more resources