Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan;45(1):31-61.
doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2024.e106. Epub 2025 Jan 1.

An Investigation of the Status of Commercial Meat Analogs and Their Ingredients: Worldwide and South Korea

Affiliations
Review

An Investigation of the Status of Commercial Meat Analogs and Their Ingredients: Worldwide and South Korea

Da Young Lee et al. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Meat analogs are a burgeoning industry, with plant-based meat analogs, insect-based meat analogs, algae-based meat analogs, mycoprotein-based meat analogs, and cell-based meat analogs. However, despite the industry's growth potential, market expansion faces hurdles due to taste and quality disparities compared to traditional meats. The composition and characteristics of meat analogs currently available in the market are analyzed in this study to inform the development of future products in this sector. The results show that plant-based meat analogs are mainly based on soy protein together with wheat gluten and methylcellulose or spices. Insect-based meat analogs tend to contain processed larvae as the protein source. Seaweed or spirulina is often the main ingredient in algae-based meat analogs. Mycoprotein-based meat analogs all use mycoproteins. Cell-based beef, pork, chicken, and seafood products are already under various stages of development around the world, although many are still at the prototype level.

Keywords: algae-based meat; cell-based meat; insect-based meat; mycoprotein-based meat; plant-based meat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Airtable Alternative protein research grants dashboard and tracker. 2024. Available from: https://airtable.com/appgQryq0y Ppcf3Dx/shrUv14p3ipJRGmh4/tblTWFw7U4vstx.... Accessed at Oct 16, 2024.
    1. Akhtar Y, Isman MB. Insects as an alternative protein source. In: Yada RY, editor. In Proteins in food processing. 2nd ed. Woodhead; Sawston, UK: 2018. pp. 263–288. (ed) - DOI
    1. Ali F, Tian K, Wang ZX. Modern techniques efficacy on tofu processing: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;116:766–785. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.07.023. - DOI
    1. Anjum S, Agnihotri V, Rana S, Pandey A, Pande V. The impact of processing methods and conditions on nutritional properties of soybean-based tofu: A review. J Food Eng Technol. 2023;12:1–13. doi: 10.32732/jfet.2023.12.1.1. - DOI
    1. Anusha S, Negi PS. Edible insects as innovative ingredients: Processing technologies and insect incorporated foods. J Insects Food Feed. 2023;9:1003–1016. doi: 10.3920/JIFF2022.0026. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources