Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 10;44(3-4):e10350.
doi: 10.1002/sim.10350.

Bayesian Modeling of Cancer Outcomes Using Genetic Variables Assisted by Pathological Imaging Data

Affiliations

Bayesian Modeling of Cancer Outcomes Using Genetic Variables Assisted by Pathological Imaging Data

Yunju Im et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

With the increasing maturity of genetic profiling, an essential and routine task in cancer research is to model disease outcomes/phenotypes using genetic variables. Many methods have been successfully developed. However, oftentimes, empirical performance is unsatisfactory because of a "lack of information." In cancer research and clinical practice, a source of information that is broadly available and highly cost-effective comes from pathological images, which are routinely collected for definitive diagnosis and staging. In this article, we consider a Bayesian approach for selecting relevant genetic variables and modeling their relationships with a cancer outcome/phenotype. We propose borrowing information from (manually curated, low-dimensional) pathological imaging features via reinforcing the same selection results for the cancer outcome and imaging features. We further develop a weighting strategy to accommodate the scenario where information borrowing may not be equally effective for all subjects. Computation is carefully examined. Simulations demonstrate competitive performance of the proposed approach. We analyze TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) LUAD (lung adenocarcinoma) data, with overall survival and gene expressions being the outcome and genetic variables, respectively. Findings different from the alternatives and with sound properties are made.

Keywords: Bayesian estimation and selection; cancer modeling; genetic variables; information borrowing; pathological imaging data; weighting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Makalic E, Schmidt DF. A Simple Sampler for the Horseshoe Estimator. IEEE Signal Processing Letters. 2016;23(1):179–182
    1. Ritter C, Tanner MA. Facilitating the Gibbs Sampler: The Gibbs Stopper and the Griddy-Gibbs Sampler. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1992;87(419):861–868
    1. Barnard J, McCulloch R, Meng XL. Modeling covariance matrices in terms of standard deviations and correlations, with application to shrinkage. Statistica Sinica. 2000;10(4):1281–1311
    1. Zhu L, Huo Z, Ma T, Oesterreich S, Tseng GC. Bayesian indicator variable selection to incorporate hierarchical overlapping group structure in multi-omics applications. The Annals of Applied Statistics. 2019;13(4):2611 – 2636.
    1. Wang F, Liang D, Li Y, Ma S. Prior information-assisted integrative analysis of multiple datasets. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(8):btad452. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources