Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;32(5):3638-3647.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16860-y. Epub 2025 Jan 22.

Patterns of Preoperative Tumor Markers Can Predict Resectability and Prognosis of Peritoneal Metastases: A Clustering Analysis

Affiliations

Patterns of Preoperative Tumor Markers Can Predict Resectability and Prognosis of Peritoneal Metastases: A Clustering Analysis

Malin Enblad et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May.

Abstract

Background: Prediction of open-close and long-term outcome is challenging in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Prognostic scores often include factors not known at baseline. Therefore, we aimed to analyze whether patterns of preoperative tumor markers could aid in prediction of open-close surgery and outcome in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) or colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM).

Patients and methods: All patients accepted for CRS and HIPEC for PMP or colorectal PM at Uppsala University Hospital in 2013-2021 were included. The tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, CA125, CA72-4, and CA15-3 were clustered using the k-means algorithm; the average silhouette width determined the optimal numbers of clusters.

Results: Clustering of patients with PMP (n = 138) and colorectal PM (n = 213) resulted in two clusters each. PMPCluster-1 (n = 124) had a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 77% (95% CI 69-85%), 11 (9%) open-close surgeries, and a median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of 17. PMPCluster-2 (n = 14) patients had poorer prognosis (36%, 95% CI 15-85%, p = 0.003), more often open-close (n = 6, 43%, p = 0.002), and higher PCI (median 36, p < 0.001). ColorectalCluster-1 (n = 191) had a 5-year OS of 28% (95% CI 21-37%), median PCI of 11, and 38 (20%) open-close surgeries. ColorectalCluster-2 (n = 22) had poorer prognosis (10%, 95% CI 3-36%, p = 0.02), higher PCI (median 26, p < 0.001), higher completeness of cytoreduction score (p = 0.005), but no difference in open-close surgery (n = 6, 27%, p = 0.411). PMPCluster-2 and ColorectalCluster-2 were characterized by markedly elevated tumor markers. Open-close surgery was unusual in cases of normal CA72-4.

Conclusions: Elevation of several preoperative tumor markers is associated with poor prognosis and increased risk of open-close. CA72-4 deserves increased attention.

Keywords: Clustering analysis; Cytoreductive surgery; HIPEC; Peritoneal metastases; Tumor markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The study was funded by research grants from Uppsala University Hospital for M.E., the Bengt Ihre Research Fellowship, and the Lion’s Research Foundation in Uppsala.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
a Scatterplot of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei separated into two groups on the basis of clustering of tumor markers; b heatmaps of tumor marker levels for the two clusters, white indicates levels below the reference value and color intensity increases with each percentile of elevation from the reference value; c overall survival Kaplan–Meier curves and number at risk table for the two clusters; PC principal component, PMP pseudomyxoma peritonei
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Scatterplot of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases separated into two groups on the basis of clustering of tumor markers; b heatmaps of tumor marker levels for the two clusters, white indicates levels below reference value and color intensity increases with each percentile of elevation from the reference value; c overall survival Kaplan–Meier curves and number at risk table for the two clusters; PC principal component
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of preoperative CA72-4 values; values for patients with open–close laparotomy is indicated by red lines and reference value is indicated by black lines; a pseudomyxoma peritonei and b colorectal peritoneal metastases

References

    1. Verwaal VJ, Bruin S, Boot H, van Slooten G, van Tinteren H. 8-year follow-up of randomized trial: cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(9):2426–32. - PubMed
    1. Huang CQ, Min Y, Wang SY, Yang XJ, Liu Y, Xiong B, et al. Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves survival for peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Oncotarget. 2017;8(33):55657–83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chua TC, Moran BJ, Sugarbaker PH, Levine EA, Glehen O, Gilly FN, et al. Early- and long-term outcome data of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei from appendiceal origin treated by a strategy of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(20):2449–56. - PubMed
    1. van Oudheusden TR, Braam HJ, Luyer MD, Wiezer MJ, van Ramshorst B, Nienhuijs SW, et al. Peritoneal cancer patients not suitable for cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC during explorative surgery: risk factors, treatment options, and prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(4):1236–42. - PubMed
    1. Iversen LH, Rasmussen PC, Laurberg S. Value of laparoscopy before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Br J Surg. 2013;100(2):285–92. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances