Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 May;48(5):1173-1183.
doi: 10.1007/s40618-025-02534-3. Epub 2025 Jan 22.

The paradoxical GH response at OGTT does not predict Pasireotide efficacy but matters for glucose metabolism

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The paradoxical GH response at OGTT does not predict Pasireotide efficacy but matters for glucose metabolism

G Occhi et al. J Endocrinol Invest. 2025 May.

Abstract

Purpose: A paradoxical increase in GH after oral glucose load (GH-Par) characterizes about one-third of acromegaly patients and is associated with a better response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs). Pasireotide is typically considered as a second-/third-line treatment. Here, we investigated the predictive role of GH-Par in pasireotide response and adverse event development.

Methods: we collected a multicenter Italian retrospective cohort of 59 patients treated with pasireotide for at least 3 months, all having GH profile from OGTT. IGF-1 normalization or at least 30% reduction at the last follow-up visit defined a responder patient.

Results: Considering the entire cohort, median IGF-1 levels before pasireotide (available in 57 patients) were 1.38 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) in patients with large (median size 18 mm) and invasive (82%) adenomas after failure of fg-SRL treatment. After a 40-month median treatment, pasireotide effectively reduced IGF-1 ULN levels in 41 patients, 37 of whom achieving normalization, and 4 with a ≥ 30% reduction. Thirteen patients were classified as GH-Par. The median pasireotide duration, dosage, and efficacy (9/12 responder in the GH-Par group and 32/45 in the GH-NPar) were similar between groups. However, the occurrence of new-onset or worsening glucose metabolism alterations (GMAs) after pasireotide was more frequent in GH-NPar (from 37 to 80%; p < 0.001) compared to GH-Par patients (from 69 to 76%), likely due to the higher prevalence of pre-existing GMAs in the GH-Par group before starting pasireotide (p = 0.038).

Conclusions: The GH-Par does not predict the response to pasireotide in acromegaly but can predict a worse metabolic profile.

Keywords: Acromegaly; GH profile; Glucose metabolism alterations; Oral glucose tolerance test; Pasireotide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: Filippo Ceccato: PhD grant by Novartis Pharma. Pietro Maffei: consultancy fees or Principal Investigator by Recordati, Pfizer, Camurus. Diego Ferone: honoraria for lectures or advisory boards from Recordati, Ipsen, Novartis-AAA, as well as research grants from Camurus and Pfizer. Federico Gatto: honoraria for lectures, manuscript writing, educational events, and consultancy from Pfizer and Recordati. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest that might be perceived as influencing the impartiality of the reported research.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
IGF-1 ULN levels in GH-Par and GH-NPar patients. The light gray bar represents IGF-1 ULN at diagnosis, the gray bar represents IGF-1 ULN before PAS, and the dark gray bar represents IGF-1 ULN after at least 3 months of PAS treatment. An overlap of the dark gray bar onto the gray one denotes a lack of positive response to PAS
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Violin plot illustrating the variation in IGF-1 ULN levels at diagnosis and before PAS, organized for patients with GH-Par and GH-NPar. The solid white line indicates the median, the dashed white line represents the interquartile range, and the black line marks the 50% reduction threshold in IGF-1 levels

Similar articles

References

    1. Fleseriu M, Biller BMK, Freda PU, Gadelha MR, Giustina A, Katznelson L, Molitch ME, Samson SL, Strasburger CJ, van der Lely AJ, Melmed S (2021) A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines. Pituitary 24(1):1–13. 10.1007/s11102-020-01091-7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bollerslev J, Heck A, Olarescu NC (2019) MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Individualised management of acromegaly. Eur J Endocrinol 181(2):R57–R71. 10.1530/EJE-19-0124 - PubMed
    1. Ghajar A, Jones PS, Guarda FJ, Faje A, Tritos NA, Miller KK, Swearingen B, Nachtigall LB (2020) Biochemical Control in Acromegaly With Multimodality Therapies: Outcomes From a Pituitary Center and Changes Over Time. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(3):e532–e543. 10.1210/clinem/dgz187 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muhammad A, Coopmans EC, Gatto F, Franck SE, Janssen JAMJL, van der Lely AJ, Hofland LJ, Neggers SJCMM (2018) Pasireotide responsiveness in acromegaly is mainly driven by somatostatin receptor subtype 2 expression. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 10.1210/jc.2018-01524 - PubMed
    1. Chiloiro S, Bianchi A, Giampietro A, Pontecorvi A, Raverot G, De Marinis L (2022) Second line treatment of acromegaly: Pasireotide or Pegvisomant? Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 36(6):101684. 10.1016/J.BEEM.2022.101684 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources