Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Sep;102(3):362-372.e8.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2025.01.019. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

Predicting the need for step-up after EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, including Quadrant-Necrosis-Infection score validation: a prospective cohort study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Predicting the need for step-up after EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, including Quadrant-Necrosis-Infection score validation: a prospective cohort study

Giuseppe Vanella et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Background and aims: Factors predicting the need for step-up procedures after endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fluid collection drainage (EUS-FCD) of peripancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) were explored in retrospective studies restricted to walled-off necrosis (WON) and lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs).

Methods: All consecutive candidates for EUS-FCD from 2020 to 2024 were included in a Prospective Registry of Therapeutic EUS (PROTECT, NCT04813055), with prospective monthly follow-up evaluating clinical success, adverse events, and recurrences. Prospectively assessed baseline clinical and morphologic factors, including the Quadrant-Necrosis-Infection (QNI) classification, were included in a stepwise logistic regression model to predict the need for step-up. The agreement between EUS and radiology in assessing the extent of necrosis was compared with the use of Cohen's kappa.

Results: Seventy patients (29 postsurgical collections, 21 pseudocysts, and 20 WONs) were treated with double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPSs) in 59% of cases and LAMSs in 41%. Clinical success was 92.9%, with a need for step-up (mostly endoscopic necrosectomy) in 35.7% of cases. Necrosis ≥60% (odds ratio [OR], 7.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-43) and being in the high-risk QNI group (OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.4-15) were the only independent predictors of any step-up. The same factors predicted the endoscopist's decision to allocate PFCs to LAMSs vs DPPSs. The high-risk QNI group was associated with a significantly longer hospital stay (12 days vs 4 days; P = .004). EUS tended to upscale the necrotic content compared with preprocedural radiology (κ = 0.31).

Conclusions: The extent of necrosis and the QNI classification strongly correlated with the need for step-up and allocation to LAMS versus DPPS drainage, suggesting a central role in treatment personalization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: G. Vanella: lecture fees from Boston Scientific, travel grants from Pentax Medical and Euromedical. G. Capurso: consulting for Boston Scientific, Pangenix, Amgen, and Viatrix. All of the other authors disclosed no financial relationships.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources