Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):e088891.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088891.

Relationship between the latent profiles of health information-seeking behaviour and glycated haemoglobin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey in rural areas of China

Lin Zeng #  1 , Yan-Ping Zhang #  2 , Xin Zhang  1 , Jing-Feng Chen  3 , Chao-Qun Bai  3 , Xiao-Xue Lei  3 , Gui-Fen Fu  4
Affiliations

Relationship between the latent profiles of health information-seeking behaviour and glycated haemoglobin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey in rural areas of China

Lin Zeng et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyse the heterogeneity of health information-seeking behaviour (HISB) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in rural areas based on latent profiles and to explore the relationship between various behaviours and glycaemic control rates and the factors influencing glycaemic control rates.

Methods: Between January and July 2022, a stratified cluster random sampling method was used to sample T2D patients in the rural Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Participants completed a general information questionnaire and a HISB scale. Latent profile analysis (LPA) identified behaviour categories, and χ2 tests examined differences in glycaemic control rates across these categories. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse factors influencing glycaemic control. The glycaemic control rate was defined as the proportion of individuals whose HbA1c levels are less than 7.0%, indicating good control, in relation to the total number of individuals assessed.

Results: A total of 2178 valid questionnaires were received in this study, and respondents were divided into three categories according to the LPA of their HISB: negative (18.3%), occlusive (46.8%) and inefficient (34.9%). The glycaemic control rate of patients with T2D in rural areas was 22.6% (494/2178 cases). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the category of patients' HISB profile, age, course of disease and educational level were the factors influencing the glycaemic control rate (all p<0.05).

Conclusion: Patients with T2D in rural areas had poor glycaemic control and inadequate HISB. Three latent profile categories were identified that reflect the HISB of this group. We recommend that clinical medical professionals develop personalised health management education based on the various latent profile characteristics of patients to promote HISB and thereby achieve optimal glycaemic control.

Keywords: China; Chronic Disease; DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of latent profile categories of health information-seeking behaviour.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Wang Q, Zhang X, Fang L, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of diabetes mellitus among middle-aged and elderly people in a rural Chinese population: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0198343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198343. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hu H, Sawhney M, Shi L, et al. A systematic review of the direct economic burden of type 2 diabetes in china. Diabetes Ther. 2015;6:7–16. doi: 10.1007/s13300-015-0096-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhong DY, Li L, Li HJ, et al. Study on the Mechanism and Molecular Docking Verification of Buyang Huanwu Decoction in Treating Diabetic Foot. World J Tradit Chin Med. 2023;9:178–90. doi: 10.4103/2311-8571.370108. - DOI
    1. American Diabetes Association 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:S15–33. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chatterjee S, Davies MJ, Heller S, et al. Diabetes structured self-management education programmes: a narrative review and current innovations. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:130–42. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30239-5. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources