Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;38(1):e70010.
doi: 10.1111/jar.70010.

Exploring the Intersection of Gender Diversity and Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review With a Focus on Clinical Care

Affiliations

Exploring the Intersection of Gender Diversity and Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review With a Focus on Clinical Care

Kady F Sternberg et al. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Little research has been conducted solely exploring gender diversity in people with intellectual disabilities. This review explores the literature, discusses the prevalence, and identifies clinical best practices for people at the intersection of gender diversity and intellectual disability.

Method: A scoping review was conducted utilising PRISMA methodology of the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Cochrane Library (Wiley), Dissertations & Theses Global (ProQuest), PsycInfo (EBSCO), Scopus and Web of Science.

Results: Five hundred seventy five titles and abstracts were screened, 61 full-text articles were reviewed and 17 met inclusion criteria. Four major themes were identified: prevalence, trauma and co-occurring mental health disorders, barriers to care and best practices.

Conclusion: This review highlights the lack of research and provides valuable insight into the experiences of people with gender diversity and intellectual disability. Further research is needed to understand the prevalence and explore the intersection and experience of gender-diverse people with intellectual disabilities.

Keywords: gender diversity; intellectual developmental disorder; intellectual disability; transgender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Achenbach, T. M., and L. A. Rescorla. 2001. Manual for the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment School‐Age Forms Profiles. Burlington, VT: Aseba.
    1. ACLU. 2023. “Mapping Attacks on LGBTQ Rights in U.S. State Legislatures.” https://www.aclu.org/legislative‐attacks‐on‐lgbtq‐rights.
    1. American Psychological Association. 2015. “Division 16 & 44. Key Terms and Concepts in Understanding Gender Diversity and Sexual Orientation Among Students.” https://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/programs/safe‐supportive/lgbt/key‐terms.pdf.
    1. Arksey, H., and L. O'Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice 8, no. 1: 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616.
    1. Bampi, V. F., I. Chahal, and G. Parkes. 2021. “Gender Incongruence and Intellectual Disability—What Services Are Provided for This Population? [Conference Presentation Abstract]. 13th European Congress of Mental Health in Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 65, no. 8: 703.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources