Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jun;12(3):1544-1557.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15205. Epub 2025 Jan 23.

State of precision medicine for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a new therapeutic age

Affiliations
Review

State of precision medicine for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a new therapeutic age

Roy Rasalam et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is defined by heart failure (HF) with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of at least 50%. HFpEF has a complex and heterogeneous pathophysiology with multiple co-morbidities contributing to its presentation. Establishing the diagnosis of HFpEF can be challenging. Two algorithms, the 'Heavy, 2 or more Hypertensive drugs, atrial Fibrillation, Pulmonary hypertension, Elderly age >60, elevated Filling pressures' (H2FPEF) and the 'Heart Failure Association Pre-test assessment, Echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, Functional testing, Final aetiology' (HFA-PEFF), can help to determine the likelihood of HFpEF in individuals with symptoms of HF. Phenotype clusters defined largely by the total number and types of co-morbidities may delineate groups of patients with HFpEF with different management needs. It is important to recognize alternative diagnoses or HFpEF mimics such as infiltrative cardiomyopathies, coronary artery disease, lung disease, anxiety, depression, anaemia, severe obesity, and physical deconditioning, among others. Treatment with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin and empagliflozin) is recommended for all patients with HFpEF unless contraindicated. Future research should consider alternative approaches to guide the initial diagnosis and treatment of HFpEF, including phenotype clustering models and artificial intelligence, and consider whether LVEF is the most useful distinguishing feature for categorizing HF. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating novel pharmacological and device-based approaches to address the pathophysiological consequences of HFpEF.

Keywords: Clinical algorithms; Diagnosis; Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Management; Phenotypes; Precision medicine; SGLT2i; Sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Boehringer Ingelheim‐Lilly Alliance was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy as it relates to Boehringer Ingelheim substances, as well as intellectual property considerations. Boehringer Ingelheim‐Lilly Alliance had no role in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the results in this study. Roy Rasalam reports providing medical education consultancy or has sat on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Australia, GSK Australia, MSD Australia, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi‐Aventis Australia. Andrew Sindone reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL, Edwards, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Healthed, Menarini, Merck Sharp and Dohm, Moderna, Mylan, Novartis, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, and Vifor; travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL, Pharmacosmos, Novartis, and Vifor; participation on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, CSL, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Menarini, Merck Sharp and Dohm, Moderna, Mylan, Novartis, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, and Vifor; is co‐author on the Australia and New Zealand Heart Failure Guidelines, the Australian Heart Failure Consensus Statement, and the Asian and Pacific Heart Failure Consensus Statement; and is co‐chair of the Cardiovascular Expert Reference Group and chair of the Heart Failure Community of Practice for the NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation. Gary Deed reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AA‐Med, Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Healthed, Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohm, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; advisory board participation for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohm, Novartis, and Sanofi; was editor of ‘The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Management of type 2 diabetes: A handbook of general practice’; is chair of the RACGP Diabetes Specific Interest Group; and is a member of the Australian Diabetes Society Clinical Guidelines/Advisory Committee and the DOHA Chronic Wound Consumables Scheme Committee. Ralph G Audehm reports consulting fees, payment, or honoraria for participation on advisory board for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, and NovoNordisk. John J Atherton was a member of the 2023 Australian Therapeutic Guidelines Cardiovascular Expert Group and reports research funding, travel support and/or honoraria paid to his employer for lectures and/or advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dome, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Roche Diagnostics, and Vifor Pharma.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Temporal trends in the relative prevalence of HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF among patients hospitalized for HF. Based on results from Get With the Guidelines‐Heart Failure (GWTG‐HF) Study., HF, heart failure; HFmrEF, heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
HFpEF diagnosis and management, summarized based on guidance in Atherton et al. 2018, and Kittleson et al. 2023, and recent clinical trial data. AF, atrial fibrillation; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; BMI, body mass index; BNP, B‐type natriuretic peptide; GLP‐1 RA, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist; HF, heart failure; HFmrEF, heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LA, left atrial; LV, left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide; PCWP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SGLT2i, sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Major trials in HFpEF. Number line indicates year of primary publication. aValues for follow‐up are median. bValues for follow‐up are mean. cWorsening HF was defined in DELIVER as either an unplanned hospitalization for HF or an urgent visit for HF. d P value for comparisons was NR in the DIG ancillary trial in HFpEF; the risk ratio was 0.99 (95% CI: 0.76–1.28). 6MWTD, 6‐min walk test distance; ACEi, angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; ARNi, angiotensin receptor‐neprilysin inhibitor; BMI, body mass index; CHARM‐Preserved, candesartan in HF assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity trial; CI, confidence interval; CV, cardiovascular; DELIVER, dapagliflozin evaluation to improve the lives of patients with HFpEF trial; DIG‐HFpEF, digitalis investigation group trial ancillary study in patients with HFpEF; EMPERIAL‐Preserved, effect of empagliflozin on exercise ability and HF symptoms in patients with chronic HFpEF; EMPEROR‐Preserved, empagliflozin outcome trial in patients with chronic HFpEF; FC, functional class; GLP‐1 RA, glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist; HF, heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; I‐Preserve, irbesartan in HFpEF trial; KCCQ‐CSS, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NR, not reported; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PARAGON‐HF, prospective comparison of ARNi with ARB global outcomes in HFpEF trial; PEP‐CHF, perindopril in elderly people with chronic HF trial; PRESERVED‐HF, dapagliflozin in preserved ejection fraction HF trial; SGLT2i, sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitor; STEP‐HFpEF, effect of semaglutide on function and symptoms in subjects with obesity‐related HFpEF; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TOPCAT, treatment of preserved cardiac function HF with an aldosterone antagonist trial.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with HF, by ejection fraction. Data are from a pooled analysis of EMPEROR‐Reduced and EMPEROR‐Preserved trial data. Up arrows indicate an increase in the characteristic with increasing LVEF; down arrows indicate a decrease in the characteristic with increasing LVEF. aIn the past 12 months. AF, atrial fibrillation; BMI, body mass index; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HF, heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA, New York Heart Association; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Figure 5
Figure 5
HFpEF phenotypes, simplified summary based on recent analyses from TOPCAT, , and reviews by Meijs et al. 202365 and Rucker et al. 2022. aAssessed by echocardiography. bAssessed by carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity. cAssessed by serum biomarkers. AF, atrial fibrillation; LV, left ventricular; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Atherton JJ, Sindone A, De Pasquale CG, Driscoll A, MacDonald PS, Hopper I, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of heart failure in Australia 2018. Heart Lung Circ 2018;27:1123‐1208. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2018.06.1042 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bozkurt B, Coats AJS, Tsutsui H, Abdelhamid CM, Adamopoulos S, Albert N. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association. Eur J Heart Fail 2021;23:352‐380. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2115 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castro RRT, Joyce E, Lakdawala NK, Stewart G, Nohria A, Givertz MM, et al. Patients report more severe daily limitations than recognized by their physicians. Clin Cardiol 2019;42:1181‐1188. doi:10.1002/clc.23269 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 2022;145:e895‐e1032. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2023 focused update of the 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J 2023;44:3627‐3639. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad195 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms