The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities
- PMID: 39845587
- PMCID: PMC11749928
- DOI: 10.1016/j.sipas.2022.100102
The state of remote learning in plastic surgery: A systematic review of modalities
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review the published literature describing remote alternative educational modalities for plastic surgery residents.
Design: Systematic review.
Setting: Independent investigators performed searches in the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases using a variety of MeSH terms and search term combinations. These studies were evaluated for inclusion based on PRISMA criteria.
Participants: Literature searches were performed from June to December 2020, and articles were collected if they met the inclusion criteria. Studies were also qualitatively assessed to determine whether the described education modality demonstrated high fidelity (anatomic accuracy and similarity to true surgery) and efficacy (improved trainee performance in a standardized skills evaluation). Results: Initial database searches resulted in 2,849 total articles. Of these, 451 articles were deemed relevant for screening, and after applying additional exclusion criteria, 202 articles were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 66 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Articles were organized into three broad categories: physical models (n = 42, 63.7%), virtual simulators (n = 16, 24.2%), and online resources (n = 8, 12.1%). Among the physical models, we identified 15 high fidelity, 20 high efficacy, 5 high fidelity and high efficacy, and 2 high efficacy but low fidelity models. Among the virtual simulators, 6 demonstrated high fidelity, 8 high efficacy, and 2 demonstrated both values. Among the online resources, 3 showed high fidelity and 3 showed high efficacy.
Conclusions: A variety of remote training modalities have been published, including articles describing virtual surgical simulators, virtual and physical anatomic models, and online resources with video modules. Further investigation is needed to evaluate how effectively training received through remote means translates to practice in live clinical scenarios in the operating room.
Acgme competency addressed: Practice-based Learning and Improvement.
Keywords: Online education; Plastic surgery; Surgical models; Systematic review; Virtual simulation.
© 2022 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Nonbiological Microsurgery Simulators in Plastic Surgery Training: A Systematic Review.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep;144(3):496e-507e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005990. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019. PMID: 31461050
-
A Systematic Review of Hand Surgery Simulation.Ann Plast Surg. 2025 May 1;94(5S Suppl 3):S474-S483. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004311. Ann Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 40310013
-
Simulation models for learning local skin flap design and execution: A systematic review of the literature.Front Surg. 2022 Jul 20;9:918912. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.918912. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35937603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of virtual reality in knee arthroscopic simulation: a systematic review.Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Mar;107(1):85-95. doi: 10.1007/s12306-021-00732-9. Epub 2021 Oct 15. Musculoskelet Surg. 2023. PMID: 34655024
References
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous