Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Different Furcal Perforation Repair Materials: An In vitro Study
- PMID: 39845621
- PMCID: PMC11749040
- DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_253_24
Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Three Different Furcal Perforation Repair Materials: An In vitro Study
Abstract
Background: The choice of sealing material is a crucial factor that influences the outcome of endodontic treatment.
Aim: The purpose of this study was to compare the sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) Angelus, Endocem MTA, and NeoPutty MTA when used as furcal perforation repair materials.
Materials and methods: A total of 45 mandibular molars were used. Root canal treatment was carried out following which standardized furcal perforations were made. The specimens were randomly divided into three groups of 15 teeth each. Group A-Furcal perforation repair by means of MTA Angelus, Group B-Furcal perforation repair using Endocem MTA, and Group C-Furcal perforation repair by NeoPutty MTA. Following the repair procedure, the pulp chambers and access openings were filled with temporary restorative material and immersed in 1% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. The teeth were sectioned longitudinally and the linear dye penetration was measured using a stereo-microscope.
Results: The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a statistically significant difference among the groups (F = 16.15, P < 0.001). On calculating the depth of leakage to the total length of the perforation, it was observed that the mean leakage was 32.83% in Group I, 52.92% in Group II and the lowest, 16.35% in Group III. The ANOVA test reveals a statistically significant difference among the groups (F = 15.92, P < 0.001). Comparing the depth of dye penetration of dye, 33.3% of the Group I samples showed ≥50%, 49%-25%, and <25% dye penetration. Although 56.7% of Group II samples showed ≥50% dye penetration, whereas 63.3% of Group III showed <25% dye penetration.
Conclusion: The present study indicated that NeoPutty MTA had the least dye penetration followed by MTA Angelus and Endocem MTA.
Keywords: Furcation defect; mineral trioxide aggregate; repair material.
Copyright: © 2024 Contemporary Clinical Dentistry.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures





References
-
- Shrestha K, Shubham S, Gautam V, Tripathi R, Arora C, Ahmed S. Sealing ability of different bioceramic materials used to repair furcal perforation: An in-vitro spectrophotometer analysis. J Chitwan Med Coll. 2022;12:13–6.
-
- Shah S, De R, Kishan KV, Ravinathanan M, Shah N, Solanki N. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of calcium sulfate with self-etch adhesive, mineral trioxide aggregate plus, and bone cement as furcal perforation repair materials: An in vitro dye extraction study. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30:573–8. - PubMed
-
- Singh P, Paul J, Al-Khuraif AA, Vellappally S, Halawany HS, Hashim M, et al. Sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate, calcium phosphate cement, and glass ionomer cement in the repair of furcation perforations. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2013;56:97–103. - PubMed
-
- Mohan TM, Sudha K, Shoba C, Sravanthi T, Yadav BS, Rani ES. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of ProRoot MTA, biodentine, and bone cement in the repair of furcation perforation – An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Adv. 2019;10:176–80.
-
- Francis T, Joshi SB, Pai AV, Sakkir N, Thaha KA. Comparison of the sealing ability of MTA-angelus, biodentine and CEM cement in the repair of large furcal perforations-a bacterial leakage study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2019;13:32–5.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources