Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985;151(1):37-41.

Endoscopic diagnosis of gastric ulcer. Evaluation of the benefits of endoscopic follow-up observation for malignancy

  • PMID: 3984654

Endoscopic diagnosis of gastric ulcer. Evaluation of the benefits of endoscopic follow-up observation for malignancy

B Trägårdh et al. Acta Chir Scand. 1985.

Abstract

Examinations at an endoscopy unit in 1976 gave diagnoses of gastric cancer in 31 patients, malignant lymphoma in 3 and new benign gastric ulcer in 223 patients. Correctness of diagnosis was judged to be verified following surgery, autopsy, clinical follow-up or five-year survival. All the malignant lesions were macroscopically and/or microscopically recognized at the first examination, except for one that was then considered to be a submucosal or extragastric tumour, but was correctly diagnosed at surgery prompted by the endoscopic findings. Of the 223 benign ulcers, 219 received a correct diagnosis at the first examination. In the other four cases malignancy was macroscopically or microscopically suspected, but was excluded following surgical excision or repeat examination. Based on these data, the authors suggest that routine endoscopic follow-up of gastric ulcer to exclude malignancy is unnecessary if the primary examination has been performed by an experienced endoscopist, and if both the macroscopic and the microscopic (biopsy) judgement unreservedly are that the lesion is benign.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources