Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Mar 3;14(2):e240134.
doi: 10.1530/ETJ-24-0134. Print 2025 Apr 1.

Comparison of short-term outcomes following minimally invasive (endoscopic/robotic) vs open thyroidectomy for patients with thyroid cancer

Comparative Study

Comparison of short-term outcomes following minimally invasive (endoscopic/robotic) vs open thyroidectomy for patients with thyroid cancer

Tingting Li et al. Eur Thyroid J. .

Abstract

Background: Selection between open thyroidectomy (OT) and minimally invasive (endoscopic/robotic) thyroidectomy for patients with thyroid cancer has been a subject of considerable debate. Comprehensive analysis of the short-term outcomes of endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET), robotic-assisted thyroidectomy (RT) and open thyroidectomy (OT) for thyroid cancer using a large-scale dataset is important.

Methods: This cohort study evaluated the outcomes of patients receiving ET, RT or OT for thyroid cancer from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2022. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed among patients treated with ET, RT or OT to balance covariates distribution. This study involved single-institution patients (aged 18-70) who had undergone ET, RT or OT for thyroid cancer.

Results: The study included 11,066 thyroid cancer patients (OT group- mean (SD) age: 42.45 (10.84) years; ET group- mean (SD) age: 36.75 (9.32) years and RT group- mean (SD) age: 40.27 (10.42) years). After PSM for demographic and clinical characteristics, 908 matched pairs of patients (ET vs OT) and 1480 matched pairs (RT vs OT) were included for further analysis. Complication analysis revealed that RT was associated with a lower rate of transient hypoparathyroidism (339 (22.9%) vs 687 (46.4%); P < 0.001), a lower rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism (4 (0.3%) vs 16 (1.1%); P = 0.012) and a lower rate of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (63 (4.3%) vs 89 (6.0%); P = 0.037).

Conclusion: This cohort study analyzed the short-term outcomes between ET, RT and OT in a large sample of patients with thyroid cancer over a period of two decades. PSM provided a comparable cohort, and the results suggested the advantage of RT, which reduced Clavien-Dindo grade Ⅰ complications in the surgical treatment of thyroid cancer.

Keywords: endoscopic/robotic thyroidectomy; hypoparathyroidism; open thyroidectomy; short-term outcomes; thyroid cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the work reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of patient inclusion and exclusion.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lirici MM, Hüscher CSG, Chiodini S, et al. . Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surg Endosc 1997. 11 877. (10.1007/s004649900476) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arora A, Swords C, Garas G, et al. . The perception of scar cosmesis following thyroid and parathyroid surgery: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2016. 25 38–43. (10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.021) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duek I, Duek OS & Fliss DM. Minimally invasive approaches for thyroid surgery-pitfalls and promises. Curr Oncol Rep 2020. 22 77. (10.1007/s11912-020-00939-2) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arora A, Garas G, Sharma S, et al. . Comparing transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy with conventional surgery in a UK population: a case control study. Int J Surg 2016. 27 110–117. (10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.071) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kandil EH, Noureldine SI, Yao L, et al. . Robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy: an examination of the first one hundred cases. J Am Coll Surg 2012. 214 558–564. (10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.01.002) - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms