Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Apr;172(2):417-428.
doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04931-9. Epub 2025 Jan 23.

Improving postsurgical paresis in brain tumor patients by transcranial magnetic stimulation

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Improving postsurgical paresis in brain tumor patients by transcranial magnetic stimulation

Tizian Rosenstock et al. J Neurooncol. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Recently, reduction of transcallosal inhibition by contralateral navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (nrTMS) improved neurorehabilitation of glioma patients with new postoperative paresis. This multicentric study examines the effect of postoperative nrTMS in brain tumor patients to treat surgery-related upper extremity paresis.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of two randomized and three one-arm studies in brain tumor patients with new/progressive postoperative paresis. Patients underwent either low frequency contralesional nrTMS or sham stimulation followed by physiotherapy. Outcome was assessed on postoperative day 1, 7, and after 3 months using British Medical Research Council score (BMRC), Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).

Results: A total of 135 patients (mean age of 53.8 years, 60 women) were included, of whom 51 patients were treated in RCTs (30 treatment group, 21 sham group) and 84 in prospective, single-arm studies. Linear mixed models showed an advantage for the treatment group for the BMRC (7 days: OR 3.28; 95%CI: 1.08-9.99; 3 months: OR 2.03, 95%CI: 0.65-6.39) and KPS (7 days: mean difference (MD) 11, 95%CI: 2-19; 3 months: MD 11, 95%CI: 2-20), less pronounced for the FMA (7 days: MD 0.28, 95%CI: -0.34-0.9; 3 months: MD 0.14, 95%CI: -0.52-0.81). A stronger treatment effect was evident with proven ischemia on the postoperative MRI. To observe an improvement by at least one grade at 3 months, the number needed to treat (NNT) for the entire cohort is 4 (BMRC) and 3 patients (KPS), respectively.

Conclusion: Our multicenter data confirm the positive treatment effect of nrTMS to reduce transcallosal inhibition with a considerably low NNT - especially if caused by ischemia.

Keywords: Glioma; Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS); Paresis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work.BM received honoraria, consulting fees, and research grants from Medtronic (Meerbusch, Germany), Icotec AG (Altstätten, Switzerland), and Relievant Medsystems Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA, USA); honoraria, and research grants from Ulrich Medical (Ulm, Germany); honoraria and consulting fees from Spineart Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany) and DePuy Synthes (West Chester, PA, USA); and royalties from Spineart Deutschland GmbH (Frankfurt, Germany). SK is a consultant for Ulrich Medical (Ulm, Germany) and Need Inc. (Santa Monica, CA, USA). TP, SK, SI and BM are consultants for Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany).SI, TP, and SK received honoraria from Nexstim Plc (Helsinki, Finland) for a webinar. TP received research grants from Carl Zeiss Meditec (Oberkochen, Germany) and Olympus Corporation (Center Valley, PA, USA).However, all authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the materials used or the results presented in this study. All authors declare no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. Ethical approval: We performed the study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. There were 4 centers involved in this study: Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (I), Technical University of Munich (II), King’s College Hospital, London (III), MD Anderson Cancer Center (IV). The study was conducted as an RCT at 2 sites (I; II), with the study transitioning to a single-arm study at one site after recruitment completion (II). All included patients provided written informed consent at each center. Local ethics boards reviewed and approved the study protocol (registration numbers: Munich NCT03982329 and 12/15, Berlin EA4/132/15, London: 20230701NCR; Houston: NCT03606161). Clinical trial registration/local institutional approval: Munich: NCT03982329, Local institutional registration: 12/15; Berlin: Deutsches Register für klinische Studien (DRKS00010043), Ethics Committee of the Charité (EA4/132/15); London: Local institutional registration 20230701NCR; Houston: NCT03606161.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scatter plot showing the outcome parameters by time point and group. All recorded values (without imputations) are shown for each time point, separated by groups (purple = Sham, blue = rTMS) for the BMRC (a, POD1: rTMS n = 90, sham n = 21; POD7: rTMS n = 96, sham n = 21; POM3: rTMS n = 71, sham n = 15), FMA (b, POD1: rTMS n = 73, sham n = 19; POD7: rTMS n = 75, sham n = 19; POM3: rTMS n = 29, sham n = 10), KPS (c, POD1: rTMS n = 96, sham n = 21; POD7: rTMS n = 106, sham n = 21; POM3: rTMS n = 78, sham n = 15) and the NIHSS (d, POD1: rTMS n = 85, sham n = 21; POD7: rTMS n = 83, sham n = 21; POM3: rTMS n = 57, sham n = 15). Colored dots represent values for individual subjects. Colored lines correspond to estimated group averages using locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (Loess) with the respective 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plots based on imputed data showing the respective treatment effects. Treatment effects for the entire study population and for subgroups (patients with ischemia, patients with preserved postoperative MEPs) are shown. Estimates are based on multiple imputed datasets (30 complete datasets). a: Analysis of the BMRC based on ordinal logistic mixed models (random intercept models, random intercepts for patients) adjusted for the BMRC values before intervention, presence of SMA tumor, tumor histology and tumor location, time point, interaction of time point and treatment allocation, center and interaction of center and treatment allocation (OR: odds ratio). b: Analysis of the FMA based on mixed models (random intercept models, random intercepts for patients) with log-transformed FMA values, adjusted for log-transformed FMA values before intervention, presence of SMA tumor, tumor histology and tumor location, time point, interaction of time point and treatment allocation, center and interaction of center and treatment allocation. c: Analysis of NIHSS based on mixed models (random intercept models, random intercepts for patients) adjusted for NIHSS values before intervention, presence of SMA tumor, tumor histology and tumor location, time point, interaction of time point and treatment allocation, center and interaction of center and treatment allocation. d: Analysis of the KPS based on mixed models (random intercept models, random intercepts for patients) adjusted for KPS values before intervention, presence of SMA tumor, tumor histology and tumor location, time point, interaction of time point and treatment allocation, center and interaction of center and treatment allocation

References

    1. Gempt J, Forschler A, Buchmann N et al (2013) Postoperative ischemic changes following resection of newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas and their clinical relevance. J Neurosurg Apr 118(4):801–808. 10.3171/2012.12.JNS12125 - PubMed
    1. McGirt MJ, Mukherjee D, Chaichana KL, Than KD, Weingart JD, Quinones-Hinojosa A (2009) Association of surgically acquired motor and language deficits on overall survival after resection of glioblastoma multiforme. Neurosurg Sep 65(3):463–469 discussion 469– 70. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000349763.42238.E9 - PubMed
    1. Karschnia P, Gerritsen JKW, Teske N et al The oncological role of resection in newly diagnosed diffuse adult-type glioma defined by the WHO 2021 classification: a review by the RANO resect group. Lancet Oncol. 2024;- 25(– 9):- e419. - PubMed
    1. Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C et al (2020) Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): an update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiology: Official J Int Federation Clin Neurophysiol Feb 131(2):474–528. 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002 - PubMed
    1. Fridman EA, Hanakawa T, Chung M, Hummel F, Leiguarda RC, Cohen LG (2004) Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke. Brain Apr 127(Pt 4):747–758. 10.1093/brain/awh082 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources