Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb;26(2):84-91.
doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01291-y. Epub 2025 Jan 23.

The Review of Modified Intersphincteric Resection in the Treatment of Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer

Affiliations
Review

The Review of Modified Intersphincteric Resection in the Treatment of Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer

Danni Li et al. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In China, the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer are increasing, in which low rectal cancer is more common. Ultra-low rectal cancer refers to rectal cancer where the distance between the tumor and the anus is less than 5 cm, it accounts for about 70%-80% of rectal tumors. Intersphincteric resection (ISR), an important technical means for anal preservation of ultra-low rectal cancer, although could reduce the pain of patients during the surgical process, increase the anal preservation rate of patients and improve the life quality of patients, still has many adverse effects such as the high incidence of anorectal anastomotic leakage and high anterior resection syndrome. Many modified ISRs have emerged due to the limitations and adverse reactions of traditional ISR surgery. the purpose of this article is to review the progress of ISR surgery to improve its use in treatment.

Keywords: Anal preservation; ISR; Intersphincteric resection; Ultra-low rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Human and animal rights and informed consent: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Intersphincteric Resection Classification

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022;7(7): 627–647. 10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00044-9 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feng RM, et al. Current cancer situation in China: good or bad news from the 2018 Global Cancer Statistics? Cancer Commun. 2019;39(1):1–12. 10.1186/s40880-019-0368-6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. [Chinese Protocol of Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer (2023 edition)]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2023;61(8):617–644. 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230603-00222 - PubMed
    1. Park JS, et al. Laparoscopic versus open intersphincteric resection and coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer: intermediate-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):941–6. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318236c448. - PubMed
    1. Peng B, et al. Intersphincteric Resection Versus Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Surg Innov. 2020;27(4):392–401. 10.1177/1553350620918414. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources