Robot-Assisted CT-Guided Biopsy with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Needle-Path Generator: An Experimental Evaluation Using a Phantom Model
- PMID: 39848324
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.01.028
Robot-Assisted CT-Guided Biopsy with an Artificial Intelligence-Based Needle-Path Generator: An Experimental Evaluation Using a Phantom Model
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the feasibility of a robotic system with artificial intelligence-based lesion detection and path planning for computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy compared with the conventional freehand technique.
Materials and methods: Eight nodules within an abdominal phantom, incorporating the simulated vertebrae and ribs, were designated as targets. A robotic system was used for lesion detection, trajectory generation, and needle holder positioning. Four interventional radiologists with more than 5 years of experience and 4 with 5 years of experience or less performed 96 robot-assisted insertions encompassing both in-plane and out-of-plane trajectories. Additionally, 32 CT fluoroscopy single-rotation scan-guided freehand needle insertions were performed along the in-plane trajectories. The 3-dimensional (3D), lateral, depth deviations, and insertion time were quantified using post-needle insertion CT scans. Statistical analysis was performed using the unpaired t-test or 1-way analysis of variance, with a significance level of P < .05.
Results: The system detected all target lesions and generated appropriate needle paths. Robot-assisted insertions exhibited significantly smaller 3D and depth deviations than freehand insertions (3.8 mm ± 1.3 vs 4.7 mm ± 1.6, P = .001, and 1.8 mm ± 1.2 vs 2.6 mm ± 1.8, P = .005, respectively). No significant difference was observed in lateral deviations (3.0 mm ± 1.5 vs 3.5 mm ± 1.5, P = .118). Robotic assistance significantly reduced insertion time compared with freehand insertion (17.3 s ± 7.8 vs 78.6 s ± 38.1, P < .001). The same trends were observed between the 2 groups of radiologists.
Conclusions: The robotic system has the potential to shorten puncture time while maintaining sufficient accuracy in CT-guided procedures.
Copyright © 2025 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
In Vivo Safety and Feasibility of a CT-Guided Robotic Device for Percutaneous Needle Placement in Bone.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025 May;36(5):877-883.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2025.01.031. Epub 2025 Jan 21. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2025. PMID: 39848322
-
Artificial Intelligence-Guided Segmentation and Path Planning Software for Transthoracic Lung Biopsy.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 May;35(5):780-789.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.02.006. Epub 2024 Feb 12. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38355040
-
Comparison of a Patient-Mounted Needle-Driving Robotic System versus Single-Rotation CT Fluoroscopy to Perform CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Biopsies.J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024 Jun;35(6):859-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.02.023. Epub 2024 Mar 5. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2024. PMID: 38447771 Free PMC article.
-
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23611316 Free PMC article.
-
Needle size for vaccination procedures in children and adolescents.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 18;(6):CD010720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010720.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 09;8:CD010720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010720.pub3. PMID: 26086647 Updated.
Cited by
-
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Musculoskeletal Interventions.Cancers (Basel). 2025 May 10;17(10):1615. doi: 10.3390/cancers17101615. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40427114 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Imaging.Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 30;17(9):1510. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091510. Cancers (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40361437 Free PMC article. Review.
-
AI and Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review of Reviews on Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 1;15(7):893. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070893. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40218243 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical