Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 15;39(1):1-4.
doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202409090.

[Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Interpretation of the consensus by the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA)]

[Article in Chinese]
Mingjin Zhong  1 , Kan Ouyang  1
Affiliations

[Revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Interpretation of the consensus by the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA)]

[Article in Chinese]
Mingjin Zhong et al. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. .

Abstract
in English, Chinese

Revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is more challenging than primary ACL reconstruction and often yields less favorable outcomes. The European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) has established a consensus regarding preoperative diagnosis, assessment, and selection criteria for ACL revision surgery. This consensus addresses 18 key issues that are most pertinent to clinical practice, providing guiding recommendations aimed at improving the prognosis of ACL revisions.

前交叉韧带（anterior cruciate ligament，ACL）翻修比初次ACL重建更具挑战性，其预后也更不理想。欧洲运动创伤、膝关节外科和关节镜学会（ESSKA）制定了一项关于ACL翻修术前诊断、评估和适应证的共识，为临床最为关注的18个问题提出指导性意见，旨在进一步改善ACL翻修预后。.

Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; consensus interpretation; revision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

利益冲突 在课题研究和文章撰写过程中不存在利益冲突

References

    1. Akoto R, Alm L, Drenck TC, et al Slope-correction osteotomy with lateral extra-articular tenodesis and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is highly effective in treating high-grade anterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(14):3478–3485. doi: 10.1177/0363546520966327. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

    1. Alm L, Drenck TC, Frings J, et al. Lower failure rates and improved patient outcome due to reconstruction of the MCL and revision ACL reconstruction in chronic medial knee instability. Orthop J Sports Med, 2021, 9(3): 2325967121989312.

    1. Alm L, Krause M, Frosch KH, et al Preoperative medial knee instability is an underestimated risk factor for failure of revision ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28(8):2458–2467. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06133-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrä K, Prill R, Kayaalp E, et al Increase in cartilage degeneration in all knee compartments after failed ACL reconstruction at 4 years of follow-up. J Orthop Traumatol. 2021;22(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00618-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Battaglia MJ, Lenhoff MW, Ehteshami JR, et al Medial collateral ligament injuries and subsequent load on the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical evaluation in a cadaveric model. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37(2):305–311. doi: 10.1177/0363546508324969. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources