Surgery lengthens survival for collecting duct carcinoma: analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan
- PMID: 39849400
- PMCID: PMC11760089
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13572-8
Surgery lengthens survival for collecting duct carcinoma: analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan
Abstract
Background: To identify the prognosis of Japanese patients with collecting duct carcinoma (CDC).
Methods: We used a hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan to extract CDC cases that were diagnosed in 2013, histologically confirmed, and determined the first course of treatment. We further investigated treatment modalities and estimated overall survival (OS) by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: A total of 61 CDC patients were identified. The 5-year OS rate for all CDC patients who were diagnosed in Japan during 2013 was 23.6% (95% CI: 15.0-37.4), with a median OS of 14 months (95% CI: 12-24). The 5-year OS rate for CDC patients at stages I, III, and IV were 53.0% (95% CI: 29.9-94.0), 35.7% (95% CI: 19.8-64.4), and 3.4% (95% CI: 0.5-23.7), respectively. Noteworthy, the 1-year OS for stage IV patients was 27.6% (95% CI: 0.5-23.7) and the median OS was only 5 months (95% CI: 4-12). We further examined the OS for advanced disease according to treatment modalities. The median OS of patients who undertook chemotherapy alone was significantly shorter than patients who undertook surgery alone for advanced disease (4 months [95% CI: 4-NA] vs. 15 months [95% CI: 13-68]; p < 0.001) and surgery-only patients had a similar median OS as surgery-plus-chemotherapy patients (19 months [95% CI: 13-NA]; p < 0.001). Moreover, a multivariable analysis for the OS in advanced disease revealed that surgery-plus-chemotherapy patients had significantly more favorable prognoses (HR 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.57).
Conclusions: Japanese CDC patients face poor prognoses similar to Western countries, especially in advanced cases that receive only chemotherapy. Surgery appears necessary for advanced disease.
Keywords: Collecting duct carcinoma; Hospital-based cancer registry; Overall survival; Renal cell carcinoma.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study protocol and data processing were approved by the University of Tsukuba Institutional Review Board (R03-228). All patients gave written, informed consent. All methods were performed under the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guideline of the University of Tsukuba. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Histopathology of surgically treated renal cell carcinoma: survival differences by subtype and stage.J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):391-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 Jun 13. J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22698625 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Factors and a Nomogram Predicting Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival for Patients with Collecting Duct Renal Cell Carcinoma.Biomed Res Int. 2021 Nov 11;2021:6736008. doi: 10.1155/2021/6736008. eCollection 2021. Biomed Res Int. 2021. PMID: 34805402 Free PMC article.
-
Italian Registry on Rare Urological Tumors (Meet-URO-23): The First Analysis on Collecting Duct Carcinoma of the Kidney.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Oct;22(5):102186. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102186. Epub 2024 Aug 2. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39179427
-
Impact of clinical and histopathological parameters on disease specific survival in patients with collecting duct renal cell carcinoma: development of a disease specific risk model.J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):458-63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.035. Epub 2013 Feb 19. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23434943
-
Does chromophobe renal cell carcinoma have better survival than clear cell renal cell carcinoma? A clinical-based cohort study and meta-analysis.Int Urol Nephrol. 2016 Feb;48(2):191-9. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-1161-3. Epub 2015 Nov 20. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016. PMID: 26589610 Review.
References
-
- Cabanillas G, Montoya-Cerrillo D, Kryvenko ON, Pal SK, Arias-Stella JA 3rd. Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: diagnosis and implications for management. Urol Oncol. 2022;40(12):525–36. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.041. - PubMed
-
- Karakiewicz PI, Trinh QD, Rioux-Leclercq N, de la Taille A, Novara G, Tostain J, Cindolo L, Ficarra V, Artibani W, Schips L, Zigeuner R, Mulders PF, Lechevallier E, Coulange C, Valeri A, Descotes JL, Rambeaud JJ, Abbou CC, Lang H, Jacqmin D, Mejean A, Patard JJ. Collecting duct renal cell carcinoma: a matched analysis of 41 cases. Eur Urol. 2007;52(4):1140–5. 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.070. - PubMed
-
- Sui W, Matulay JT, Robins DJ, James MB, Onyeji IC, RoyChoudhury A, Wenske S, DeCastro GJ. Collecting duct carcinoma of the kidney: Disease characteristic and treatment outcomes from the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol. 2017;35(9):540.e13-540.e18. 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.04.010. - PubMed
-
- Panunzio A, Tappero S, Hohenhorst L, Cano Garcia C, Piccinelli M, Barletta F, Tian Z, Tafuri A, Briganti A, De Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Terrone C, Kapoor A, Saad F, Shariat SF, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A, Karakiewicz PI. Collecting duct carcinoma: Epidemiology, clinical characteristics and survival. Urol Oncol. 2023;41(2):119.e7-110.e14. 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.009. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical