Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 13;15(1):46.
doi: 10.3390/bios15010046.

Mapping Surface Potential in DNA Aptamer-Neurochemical and Membrane-Ion Interactions on the SOS Substrate Using Terahertz Microscopy

Affiliations

Mapping Surface Potential in DNA Aptamer-Neurochemical and Membrane-Ion Interactions on the SOS Substrate Using Terahertz Microscopy

Kosei Morita et al. Biosensors (Basel). .

Abstract

In this study, we utilized a terahertz chemical microscope (TCM) to map surface potential changes induced by molecular interactions on silicon-on-sapphire (SOS) substrates. By functionalizing the SOS substrate with DNA aptamers and an ion-selective membrane, we successfully detected and visualized aptamer-neurochemical complexes through the terahertz amplitude. Additionally, comparative studies of DNA aptamers in PBS buffer and artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) were performed by computational structure modeling and terahertz measurements. Beyond neurochemicals, we also investigated calcium ions, measuring their concentrations in PDMS-fabricated micro-wells using minimal sample volumes. Our results highlight the capability of TCM as a powerful, label-free, and sensitive platform for the probing and mapping of surface potential arising from molecular interactions, with broad implications for biomedical diagnostics and research.

Keywords: DNA aptamer–neurochemical complexes; SOS substrate; artificial cerebrospinal fluid; membrane–ion interactions; surface potential; terahertz chemical microscope.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of SOS substrate (a) and TCM optical setup (b).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Surface functionalization on SOS substrate with serotonin-binding DNA aptamers; (b) AFM image of serotonin-binding DNA aptamers.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Terahertz amplitude distribution at increasing serotonin concentrations; (b) concentration-dependent THz amplitude response to serotonin; (c) real-time THz response to 1 ppb serotonin; (d) real-time THz response to 100 ppb serotonin; (e) real-time THz response to 1000 ppb serotonin.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Molecular interactions and experimental analysis of DNA aptamer–serotonin complexes in aCSF and PBS. (a) Structural modeling in aCSF; (b) structural modeling in PBS; (c) experimental results in aCSF and PBS (over 200 data points measured on a single SOS substrate and averaged); (d) terahertz amplitude distribution mapping in aCSF and PBS.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Molecular interactions and experimental analysis of DNA aptamer–dopamine complexes in aCSF and PBS. (a) Structural modeling in PBS and aCSF; (b) experimental results in aCSF and PBS (over 100 data points measured on a single SOS substrate and averaged); (c) terahertz amplitude distribution mapping in aCSF and PBS.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The results of calcium ion concentration measurements using PDMS microwells. (a) shows the differences before and after the calcium ion reaction. This confirms the change in terahertz wave intensity in the PDMS wells. (b) The mean value and standard deviation of each plot in (b), (c) presents THz intensity distribution maps for three different SOS substrates (samples 1, 2, and 3) exposed to varying Ca2+ concentrations (10−1 to 104 mol/L). The images depict how THz amplitude responds to increasing ion concentrations, demonstrating a highly linear correlation over a wide concentration range in (d).

Similar articles

References

    1. Kathmann S.M., Kuo I.F.W., Mundy C.J., Schenter G.K. Understanding the surface potential of water. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2011;115:4369–4377. doi: 10.1021/jp1116036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen S., Dong H., Yang J. Surface potential/charge sensing techniques and applications. Sensors. 2020;20:1690. doi: 10.3390/s20061690. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen C.V., Nakahara H., Phan C.M. Surface potential of the air/water interface. J. Phys. Chem. 2020;69:519–528. doi: 10.5650/jos.ess20024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee H., Lee W., Lee J.H., Yoon D.S. Surface potential analysis of nanoscale biomaterials and devices using Kelvin probe force microscopy. J. Nanomater. 2016;2016:4209130. doi: 10.1155/2016/4209130. - DOI
    1. Brown M.A., Abbas Z., Kleibert A., Green R.G., Goel A., May S., Squires T.M. Determination of surface potential and electrical double-layer structure at the aqueous electrolyte-nanoparticle interface. Phys. Rev. X. 2016;6:011007. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.011007. - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources