Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 25;11(1):5.
doi: 10.3390/jof11010005.

Utility of Cand PCR in the Diagnosis of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnant Women

Affiliations

Utility of Cand PCR in the Diagnosis of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis in Pregnant Women

Eduardo García-Salazar et al. J Fungi (Basel). .

Abstract

Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) can lead to multiple complications when it occurs during pregnancy, so it is necessary to diagnose it promptly for effective treatment. Traditional methods for identifying Candida spp. are often too time-consuming and have limited specificity and sensitivity. In this work, we evaluated the diagnostic utility of an endpoint PCR assay (Cand PCR) in vaginal swab specimens. Using a cotton swab, 108 vaginal swab samples were taken from pregnant women who consented to participate in the study. The samples were inoculated in Sabouraud agar plates (the gold standard) and subsequently used to extract DNA directly from the exudate. The yeasts isolated from the Sabouraud agar were identified in CHROMagar™ Candida. DNA extracted from vaginal swabs was amplified by Cand PCR. Based on the results of the Cand PCR and the gold standard, sensitivity (S), specificity (E), positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were determined. Cand PCR presented an S = 65%, E = 100%, PPV = 100% and NPV = 91%. Cand PCR showed low sensitivity for detecting Candida spp. directly from vaginal swabs, but it was useful for identifying the etiologic agent and reducing the time to obtain the result, which is usually at least 48 h.

Keywords: Candida spp.; diagnosis; molecular identification; mycotic vulvovaginitis; pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of Candida species isolated from vaginal swabs from pregnant women.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Electrophoretic analysis of DNA samples extracted directly from vaginal swab specimens from pregnant women. Electrophoresis was conducted in 1.0% agarose gel stained with Midori Green in a 0.5× TBE buffer. Electrophoresis was run at 70 V for two hours.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Amplification of DNA samples obtained directly from vaginal swab samples from pregnant women. Electrophoresis was performed in 1.5% agarose gel in a 0.5× TBE buffer stained with Midori Green. M: 100 bp molecular size marker. C−: negative control, C+: positive control (DNA of C. albicans ATCC® 18804™).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Amplification of DNA samples obtained directly from vaginal swab samples from pregnant women. Electrophoresis was performed in 1.5% agarose gel in a 0.5× TBE buffer stained with Midori Green. M: 100 bp molecular size marker. C−: negative control, C+: positive control (DNA of C. albicans ATCC® 18804™).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Amplification of DNA samples obtained directly from vaginal swab samples from pregnant women. Electrophoresis was performed in 1.5% agarose gel in a 0.5× TBE buffer stained with Midori Green. M: 100 bp molecular size marker. C−: negative control, C+: positive control (DNA of C. albicans ATCC® 18804™).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Frequency of Candida species identified by Cand PCR in vaginal swab samples from pregnant women.

Similar articles

References

    1. Achkar J.M., Fries B.C. Candida infections of the genitourinary tract. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2010;23:253–273. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00076-09. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aguin T.J., Sobel J.D. Vulvovaginal candidiasis in pregnancy. Curr. Infect Dis. Rep. 2015;17:462. doi: 10.1007/s11908-015-0462-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosati D., Bruno M., Jaeger M., Ten Oever J., Netea M.G. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis: An immunological perspective. Microorganisms. 2020;8:144. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020144. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sobel J.D. Vulvovaginal candidosis. Lancet. 2007;369:1961–1971. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60917-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thomas-White K., Navarro P., Wever F., King L., Dillard L.R., Krapf J. Psychosocial impact of recurrent urogenital infections: A review. Womens Health. 2023;19:17455057231216537. doi: 10.1177/17455057231216537. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources