Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Apr;27(4):2131-2137.
doi: 10.1111/dom.16209. Epub 2025 Jan 24.

Evaluation of the analytical and clinical accuracy of four blood glucose meters in pregnant women with hyperglycaemia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the analytical and clinical accuracy of four blood glucose meters in pregnant women with hyperglycaemia

Jincy Immanuel et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Aims: Physiological changes during pregnancy can infuence the performance of blood glucose meters. This study aimed to evaluate the analytical and clinical accuracy of glucose meters in pregnant women with hyperglycaemia.

Materials and methods: Glucose was measured by four commonly used meters among consecutive women with diabetes in pregnancy. Capillary and venous samples were collected concurrently and compared with i-STAT (amperometry) and laboratory (hexokinase) glucose as reference methods. Bland-Altman plot, International Organization for Standardization criteria, surveillance error grid (SEG) and haematocrit influence were assessed.

Results: In total, 824 paired samples from 103 women were analysed (GDM 57%, mean i-STAT capillary glucose 6.7 ± 2.3 mmol/L [121 ± 41 mg/dL], laboratory glucose 6.6 ± 2.4 mmol/L [119 ± 43 mg/dL], median haematocrit 0.36 L/L). Mean capillary glucose measured on all meters was significantly different from that measured on i-STAT (all p < 0.001), whereas venous glucose measured on Contour Next, Accu-Chek Guide and the laboratory (plasma) was similar. Contour Next had the lowest bias when using both reference methods (mean bias [95% limits of agreement] meter vs. i-STAT: Contour Next 1.3% [-8% to 10.6%], Accu-Chek Guide -3.2% [-11.4% to 5%], FreeStyle Optium Neo -11.9% [-24.7% to 0.8%] and LifeSmart 6.8% [-5.8% to 19.4%]; meter versus laboratory: -0.2% [-8.1% to 7.7%], -0.2% [-10.2% to 9.8%], -3.8% [-17.6% to 10%] and 6.1% [-5.9% to 18.2%]), respectively. Only Contour Next and Accu-Chek Guide had ≥97% of pairs within the SEG no-risk zone during both comparisons. Meters did not show haematocrit-related bias.

Conclusions: Accuracy of meters was higher when using venous samples than when using capillary samples. Contour Next and Accu-Chek Guide meters met accuracy standards in all analyses.

Keywords: Bland–Altman plot; accuracy; blood glucose meters; haematocrit; pregnancy; surveillance error grid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The glucose meter manufacturers supplied devices for use in the study.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dong W, Li Y, Sun JJ, Chen LH, Guo J, Dong L. Do patients with gestational diabetes mellitus and their own blood glucose meter have better pregnancy outcomes than those not using a glucose meter? Medicine. 2020;99:e23793. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tonyushkina K, Nichols JH. Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009;3:971‐980. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ekhlaspour L, Mondesir D, Lautsch N, et al. Comparative accuracy of 17 point‐of‐care glucose meters. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11:558‐566. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boren SA, Clarke WL. Analytical and clinical performance of blood glucose monitors. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:84‐97. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Immanuel J, Simmons D. A perspective on the accuracy of blood glucose meters during pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:2053‐2058. - PubMed