Evaluation of the analytical and clinical accuracy of four blood glucose meters in pregnant women with hyperglycaemia
- PMID: 39853836
- PMCID: PMC11885108
- DOI: 10.1111/dom.16209
Evaluation of the analytical and clinical accuracy of four blood glucose meters in pregnant women with hyperglycaemia
Abstract
Aims: Physiological changes during pregnancy can infuence the performance of blood glucose meters. This study aimed to evaluate the analytical and clinical accuracy of glucose meters in pregnant women with hyperglycaemia.
Materials and methods: Glucose was measured by four commonly used meters among consecutive women with diabetes in pregnancy. Capillary and venous samples were collected concurrently and compared with i-STAT (amperometry) and laboratory (hexokinase) glucose as reference methods. Bland-Altman plot, International Organization for Standardization criteria, surveillance error grid (SEG) and haematocrit influence were assessed.
Results: In total, 824 paired samples from 103 women were analysed (GDM 57%, mean i-STAT capillary glucose 6.7 ± 2.3 mmol/L [121 ± 41 mg/dL], laboratory glucose 6.6 ± 2.4 mmol/L [119 ± 43 mg/dL], median haematocrit 0.36 L/L). Mean capillary glucose measured on all meters was significantly different from that measured on i-STAT (all p < 0.001), whereas venous glucose measured on Contour Next, Accu-Chek Guide and the laboratory (plasma) was similar. Contour Next had the lowest bias when using both reference methods (mean bias [95% limits of agreement] meter vs. i-STAT: Contour Next 1.3% [-8% to 10.6%], Accu-Chek Guide -3.2% [-11.4% to 5%], FreeStyle Optium Neo -11.9% [-24.7% to 0.8%] and LifeSmart 6.8% [-5.8% to 19.4%]; meter versus laboratory: -0.2% [-8.1% to 7.7%], -0.2% [-10.2% to 9.8%], -3.8% [-17.6% to 10%] and 6.1% [-5.9% to 18.2%]), respectively. Only Contour Next and Accu-Chek Guide had ≥97% of pairs within the SEG no-risk zone during both comparisons. Meters did not show haematocrit-related bias.
Conclusions: Accuracy of meters was higher when using venous samples than when using capillary samples. Contour Next and Accu-Chek Guide meters met accuracy standards in all analyses.
Keywords: Bland–Altman plot; accuracy; blood glucose meters; haematocrit; pregnancy; surveillance error grid.
© 2025 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The glucose meter manufacturers supplied devices for use in the study.
Similar articles
-
A glucose meter accuracy and precision comparison: the FreeStyle Flash Versus the Accu-Chek Advantage, Accu-Chek Compact Plus, Ascensia Contour, and the BD Logic.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Apr;10(2):102-10. doi: 10.1089/dia.2007.0244. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008. PMID: 18260773 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of Blood Glucose Meter Efficacy in an Antenatal Diabetes Clinic.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18(2):68-74. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0104. Epub 2015 Oct 6. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016. Retraction in: Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Jun;19(6):382. doi: 10.1089/dia.2015.0104.retract. PMID: 26440810 Retracted.
-
A Perspective on the Accuracy of Blood Glucose Meters During Pregnancy.Diabetes Care. 2018 Oct;41(10):2053-2058. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0833. Diabetes Care. 2018. PMID: 30237233 Review.
-
[Accuracy and reliability between glucose meters: A study under normal clinical practice conditions].Semergen. 2017 Jan-Feb;43(1):20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.semerg.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Mar 8. Semergen. 2017. PMID: 26968861 Spanish.
-
Assessment of three frequently used blood glucose monitoring devices in clinical routine.Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Jul 12;142:w13631. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13631. eCollection 2012. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012. PMID: 22791566
References
-
- Immanuel J, Simmons D. A perspective on the accuracy of blood glucose meters during pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2018;41:2053‐2058. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous