Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Feb;17(1):e12646.
doi: 10.1111/aphw.12646.

Effects of an intervention targeting social media app use on well-being outcomes: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of an intervention targeting social media app use on well-being outcomes: A randomized controlled trial

Lina Christin Brockmeier et al. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Interventions targeting social media use show mixed results in improving well-being outcomes, particularly for persons with problematic forms of smartphone use. This study assesses the effectiveness of an intervention app in enhancing well-being outcomes and the moderating role of persons' perceptions about problematic smartphone use (PSU).

Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, N = 70 participants, allocated to the intervention (n = 35) or control condition (n = 35), completed weekly online surveys at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up. Participants from the intervention condition received personalized full-screen nudges to reduce their social media app use. This secondary analysis focuses on the repeatedly assessed outcomes well-being, positive affect, negative affect, and perceived stress. Linear mixed models were computed.

Results: No significant time x group effects were found, but intervention condition participants reported higher well-being and lower negative affect and stress levels at follow-up. Only one significant moderation was found, indicating that participants reporting higher PSU levels benefited more from the intervention in reducing stress.

Conclusions: The intervention was partly effective and particularly beneficial in reducing stress among smartphone users with higher PSU, highlighting the need to tailor interventions. Present findings need to be replicated by future research using a larger sample size.

Keywords: affect; digital disconnection; digital nudge; intervention app; problematic smartphone use; stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LM was employed as a working student at the Wellspent GmbH during the time of the intervention period. CR is co‐founder of the Wellspent GmbH.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart showing condition allocation and participant dropout across the study. Note: ‘T' = time.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Relationship between the intervention (vs. control condition) and perceived stress for low (M – 1SD), average, and high (M + 1SD) levels of PSU. Note: Time coded as 0 = Baseline/Week1, 1 = Week 2, 2 = Week 3.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aagaard, J. (2021). ‘From a small click to an entire action’: Exploring students' anti‐distraction strategies. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), 355–365. 10.1080/17439884.2021.1896540 - DOI
    1. Aalbers, G. , vanden Abeele, M. M. , Hendrickson, A. , De Marez, L. , & Keijsers, L. (2022). Caught in the moment: Are there person‐specific associations between momentary procrastination and passively measured smartphone use? Mobile Media & Communication, 10(1), 115–135. 10.1177/2050157921993896 - DOI
    1. Ambuehl, B. , & Inauen, J. (2022). Contextualized measurement scale adaptation: A 4‐step tutorial for health psychology research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12775. 10.3390/ijerph191912775 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Augner, C. , Vlasak, T. , Aichhorn, W. , & Barth, A. (2021). The association between problematic smartphone use and symptoms of anxiety and depression—A meta‐analysis. Journal of Public Health, 45(1), 193–201. 10.1093/pubmed/fdab350 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barr, D. J. , Levy, R. , Scheepers, C. , & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types