Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr:80:103881.
doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.103881. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

The 2024 Assisi think tank on breast cancer: Focus on the use of a tumour bed boost after breast conserving therapy

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

The 2024 Assisi think tank on breast cancer: Focus on the use of a tumour bed boost after breast conserving therapy

Meritxell Arenas et al. Breast. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

At the Fifth Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer, one key topic was the role of tumor bed boost in invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. The need for a tumor bed boost after whole breast irradiation is controversial. A literature review assessed boost indications, target volume definition, techniques, dose fractionation, and ongoing trials. Findings indicated that while a boost halves the risk of local recurrence at 10 years, it also leads to worsened cosmetic outcomes and increased fibrosis without improving overall survival. Therefore, we would recommend to omit the boost if the estimated reduction in local recurrence at 10 years is less than 3 %, and to apply shared decision-making with patients, if the boost is expected to reduce the local recurrence rate with >3 % at 10 years. Future research will focus on identifying patient subgroups that can safely omit the boost and improving boost volume precision.

Keywords: Boost technique; Breast cancer; Dose fractionation; Local recurrence; Radiation therapy; Target volume definition; Tumour bed boost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interests All the authors declare no confict of interest.

References

    1. Fisher B., Anderson S., Redmond C.K., Wolmark N., Wickerham D.L., Cronin W.M. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1456–1461. - PubMed
    1. Sarrazin D., Lê M.G., Arriagada R., Contesso G., Fontaine F., Spielmann M., et al. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. 1989;14:177–184. - PubMed
    1. Litière S., Werutsky G., Fentiman I.S., Rutgers E., Christiaens M.R., Van Limbergen E., et al. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:412–419. - PubMed
    1. Veronesi U., Salvadori B., Luini A., Greco M., Saccozzi R., del Vecchio M., et al. Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with small cancer of the breast. Long-term results of three randomised trials on 1,973 patients. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 1995;31a:1574–1579. - PubMed
    1. Bartelink H., Horiot J.C., Poortmans P.M., Struikmans H., Van den Bogaert W., Fourquet A., et al. Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3259–3265. - PubMed

MeSH terms