Tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (MORPHEUS-Liver): a randomised, open-label, phase 1b-2, study
- PMID: 39855251
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00679-X
Tiragolumab in combination with atezolizumab and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (MORPHEUS-Liver): a randomised, open-label, phase 1b-2, study
Abstract
Background: PD-L1 and VEGF blockade with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has been shown to improve survival in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. TIGIT is an immune checkpoint regulator implicated in many cancers, including unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we evaluate the clinical activity and safety of the addition of tiragolumab, an anti-TIGIT monoclonal antibody, to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.
Methods: This randomised, open-label, phase 1b-2 umbrella study was conducted at 26 centres across China, France, Israel, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years old or older with previously untreated locally advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, Child-Pugh class A disease, and a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using permuted block randomisation to receive either tiragolumab 600 mg plus atezolizumab 1200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg or atezolizumab 1200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, administered via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Patients received treatment until unacceptable toxic effects or loss of clinical benefit, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Analysis of clinical activity was done in the efficacy-evaluable population (all patients who received at least one dose of each drug for their assigned treatment regimen) and safety was assessed in all patients who received any study treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04524871, and is ongoing.
Findings: Between Aug 20, 2020, and Feb 10, 2022, we assessed 154 patients for eligibility and 59 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n=41) or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n=18); one patient in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group experienced an adverse event before receiving any treatment and withdrew from the study. Median age was 65·0 years (IQR 61·0-73·0). 46 (79%) of 58 patients were male and 12 (21%) were female. Most patients were Asian (23 [40%]) or White (21 [36%]). At the time of clinical cutoff (Aug 21, 2023), median follow-up was 20·6 months (IQR 10·6-28·0) in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and 14·0 months (4·2-18·5) in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. The confirmed objective response rate was 43% (95% CI 27-59, n=17) in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and 11% (1-35, n=2) in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. All patients in both groups experienced an adverse event. The incidence of pruritis (20 [50%] of 40 patients vs three [17%] of 18 patients), arthralgia (13 [33%] vs two [11%]), and diarrhoea (12 [30%] vs one [6%]) was notably higher in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group than in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group, although these were mainly grade 1-2. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (six [15%] of 40 patients in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group vs two [11%] of 18 patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group), aspartate aminotransferase increased (three [8%] of 40 patients vs one [6%] of 18 patients), and proteinuria (two [5%] of 40 patients vs two [11%] of 18 patients). Serious adverse events occurred in 21 (53%) of 40 patients in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group and in ten (56%) of 18 patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in one patient in the tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group (due to cholestasis) and two patients in the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab group (due to oesophageal varices haemorrhage and upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage). The addition of tiragolumab to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab did not appear to result in a substantial worsening of treatment-related or immune-mediated adverse events, and no new safety signals were identified.
Interpretation: This signal-seeking study suggests that the addition of tiragolumab to atezolizumab and bevacizumab might be more clinically active than atezolizumab plus bevacizumab alone in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Based on these data, further study of combination tiragolumab plus atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is warranted.
Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests RSF reports institutional grants from Adaptimmune, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Genentech, and F Hoffmann-La Roche; personal consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, CStone, Eisai, Exelixis, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Hengrui, Merck, Pfizer, and F Hoffmann-La Roche; personal payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Genentech; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AstraZeneca and Hengrui. C-HH reports an institutional research grant from F Hoffmann-La Roche; institutional grants for sponsor-initiated clinical trials from AstraZeneca, Merck, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Surface Oncology; personal consulting fees from F Hoffmann-La Roche; personal payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from BMS, Eisai, Merck, Ono Pharmaceutical, and F Hoffmann-La Roche; support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for F Hoffmann-La Roche. DL reports institutional grants or contracts from AstraZeneca and Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics; personal consulting fees from AbbVie, Adagene, AstraZeneca, Coherus, Delcath, Eisai, Exelixis, Genentech, Ipsen, Biopharmaceuticals, Merck, QED, Servier, Sumitomo, Tersera, Transthera, and TriSalus; and support for attending meetings or travel from Genentech. AMB reports institutional grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific, Cogent Biosciences, Deciphera, Exelixis, Genentech, Hengrui, Inhibrx, Merck, and Tvardi Therapeutics; personal payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers' bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, Deciphera, and France Foundation; and participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for AstraZeneca, Deciphera, Exelixis, Eisai, and Genentech. CC is an employee and stockholder of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech and reports support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. SB is an employee of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech and reports support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech, is an International Executive Council member of NCODA (unpaid), and member of the Triage Cancer Scientific Advisory Council (unpaid). YW is an employee and stockholder of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. AY is an employee and stockholder of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech and reports support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. TRE is an employee of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. SM is an employee and stockholder of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech and reports support for attending meetings or travel from F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. MHS is an employee and stockholder of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. CSS is an employee and stockholder of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. NY is an employee of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. SPH is an employee and stockholder of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. EC is an employee and stockholder of F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech. EG reports participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Aligos, Gilead, GSK, F Hoffmann-La Roche, and Virion. B-YR reports no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (GO30140): an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b study.Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):808-820. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30156-X. Lancet Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32502443 Clinical Trial.
-
Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study.Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):977-990. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00252-7. Epub 2021 Jun 15. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34143971 Clinical Trial.
-
Patient-reported outcomes with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (IMbrave150): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):991-1001. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00151-0. Epub 2021 May 27. Lancet Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34051880 Clinical Trial.
-
Toripalimab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HEPATORCH): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul;10(7):658-670. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00059-7. Epub 2025 May 20. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025. PMID: 40409323 Clinical Trial.
-
Tiragolumab plus atezolizumab versus placebo plus atezolizumab as a first-line treatment for PD-L1-selected non-small-cell lung cancer (CITYSCAPE): primary and follow-up analyses of a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study.Lancet Oncol. 2022 Jun;23(6):781-792. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00226-1. Epub 2022 May 13. Lancet Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35576957 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Prognostic Biomarkers for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated With Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Combination Therapy.Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251339243. doi: 10.1177/10732748251339243. Epub 2025 Apr 29. Cancer Control. 2025. PMID: 40302025 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immune microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: from pathogenesis to immunotherapy.Cell Mol Immunol. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1038/s41423-025-01308-4. Online ahead of print. Cell Mol Immunol. 2025. PMID: 40500404 Review.
-
Managing hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: emerging role of immune checkpoint inhibitors.Discov Oncol. 2025 Jul 28;16(1):1431. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-03226-3. Discov Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40721563 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Attenuated immune surveillance during squamous cell transformation of pancreatic adenosquamous cancer defines new therapeutic opportunity for cancer interception.J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Jun 23;13(6):e012066. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2025-012066. J Immunother Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40550564 Free PMC article.
-
Moving the needle on immune checkpoint inhibitors with novel targets: are we being TIMid or LAGging behind?Oncologist. 2025 Jul 4;30(7):oyaf145. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf145. Oncologist. 2025. PMID: 40631775 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials