Lack of comparability between CEA analyses using three different methods
- PMID: 3985564
- DOI: 10.1177/000456328502200111
Lack of comparability between CEA analyses using three different methods
Abstract
Three different methods for the assay of carcinoembryonic antigen were investigated--radioimmunoassay, enzyme-linked immunoassay, and a commercial immunoradiometric assay. Two standard preparations of CEA were used: the 1st British Standard (73/601) and a commercial preparation obtained as a component of the IRMA kit. Serum samples were assayed by each method against each standard material. Significant differences between results were obtained when the different methods were compared. When using the two standards in the same assay system no significant differences were found between results. A possible explanation and the implications of these findings for the routine assay of CEA are discussed.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a commercial enzyme radioimmunoassay kit for serum carcinoembryonic antigen.Ann Clin Biochem. 1981 Jul;18(Pt 4):248-51. doi: 10.1177/000456328101800412. Ann Clin Biochem. 1981. PMID: 7025735
-
Study of an enzyme immunoassay kit for carcinoembryonic antigen.Clin Chem. 1980 Nov;26(12):1718-22. Clin Chem. 1980. PMID: 7000391
-
Comparison of RIA and IRMA methods for measurement of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA).Clin Biochem. 1982 Oct;15(5):241-7. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(82)97007-2. Clin Biochem. 1982. PMID: 7151270
-
Noncompetitive enzyme immunoassay for carcinoembryonic antigen by flow injection chemiluminescence.Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Mar;341(1-2):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2003.11.014. Clin Chim Acta. 2004. PMID: 14967165
-
[Analytical problems in the determination of tumor markers].Nucl Med Biol. 1994 Apr;21(3):477-82. doi: 10.1016/0969-8051(94)90071-x. Nucl Med Biol. 1994. PMID: 9296768 Review. French. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources