Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 24;15(1):3094.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83300-y.

Natural repeated backcrosses lead to triploidy and tetraploidy in parthenogenetic butterfly lizards (Leiolepis: Agamidae)

Affiliations

Natural repeated backcrosses lead to triploidy and tetraploidy in parthenogenetic butterfly lizards (Leiolepis: Agamidae)

Eduard Galoyan et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Obligatory parthenogenesis in vertebrates is restricted to squamate reptiles and evolved through hybridisation. Parthenogens can hybridise with sexual species, resulting in individuals with increased ploidy levels. We describe two successive hybridisations of the parthenogenetic butterfly lizards (genus Leiolepis) in Vietnam with a parental sexual species. Contrary to previous proposals, we document that parthenogenetic L. guentherpetersi has mitochondrial DNA and two haploid sets from L. guttata and one from L. reevesii, suggesting that it is the result of a backcross of a parthenogenetic L. guttata × L. reevesii hybrid with a L. guttata male increasing ploidy from 2n to 3n. Within the range of L. guentherpetersi, we found an adult tetraploid male with three L. guttata and one L. reevesii haploid genomes. It probably originated from fertilisation of an unreduced triploid L. guentherpetersi egg by a L. guttata sperm. Although its external morphology resembles that of the maternal species, it possessed exceptionally large erythrocytes and was likely sterile. As increased ploidy level above triploidy or tetraploidy appears to be harmful for amniotes, all-female asexual lineages should evolve a strategy to prevent incorporation of other haploid genomes from a sexual species by avoiding fertilisation by sexual males.

Keywords: Leiolepis; Hybridisation; Meiosis; Parthenogenesis; Tetraploidy; Vietnam.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval: The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of the Zoological Institute Russian Academy of Sciences (protocol No.1-3-15-06-2021, 15 June 2021); by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of A.N. Severtsov Institution of Ecology and Evolution, N48 27 May, 2021 and by Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology – Institute of Genome research. (protocol No.115/QĐ-NCHG, 4th July 2021, based on the Vietnam Museum of Nature - Academy of Sciences and Vietnam Technology i (No. 639/BTTNVN dated September 12, 2019). All applicable international, national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed during this research.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Photo of the putative hybrid male N34_H (ZMMU R-17884) in situ.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Phylogenetic tree of sampled Leiolepis with field numbers based on a fragment of cyt b. Values over and under the nodes represent posterior probabilities by BI/bootstrap values by ML. Accession numbers from GenBank are shown in blue colour.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
FAMD scatterplot of the first two dimensions based on the scalation and colouration characters of parthenogenetic females L. guentherpetersi (n = 28); 12 females and 6 males of L. guttata, and 3 females and 4 males of L. reevesii. The putative hybrid male N34_H (R-17884) is morphologically close to L. guentherpetersi.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Relative DNA content of blood cell nuclei measured by flow cytometry and cell parameters of erythrocytes. All histograms depict the measurements of samples mixed with the internal control of diploid standard (Gallus domesticus). The measurements support diploidy in L. guttata (a), triploidy in L. guentherpetersi (b) and tetraploidy in the male hybrid (c). Boxplots show maximum cell length MCL (d), maximum nuclei length MNL (e) and cell projection area CPA (f) of erythrocytes in L. guttata (green), L. guentherpetersi (yellow) and 4n-hybrid (blue).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Metaphase of diploid L. guttata N140 with 12 macrochromosomes (a), triploid L. guentherpetersi N3 with 18 macrochromosomes (b), and tetraploid hybrid N34_H with 24 macrochromosomes (c). In line with the consistent pattern in diploid species L. guttata (d), comparative genomic hybridisation identified six macrochromosomes inherited from L. reevesii (labelled by Cy3, red) and 12 chromosomes from L. guttata (labelled by Fluorescein, green) in triploid L. guentherpetersi (e), and the tetraploid hybrid male N34_H (f) possessed six chromosomes from L. reevesii and 18 chromosomes from L. guttata. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Synaptonemal complex (SC) spreads of L. reevesii (a), L. guttata (b) and Leiolepis tetraploid hybrid (c,d) males. Lateral components of the synaptonemal complex were detected by antibodies against SYCP3 protein (green); crossing over loci were visualised by antibodies against MLH1 protein (indicated by arrows, red); transverse filaments of central space of the SCs were identified by antibodies against SYCP1 protein (magenta); chromatin stained by DAPI (blue). SC spreads of L. reevesii (a) and L. guttata (b) are represented by 18 bivalents. In a hybrid, 12 bivalents are formed by 24 macrochromosomes and the remaining bivalents are formed by microchromosomes (c,d). Black and white (c) and colour (d) images are presented on the same nucleus. Scale bar = 10 μm.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
The reconstructed hybridisation events led to the emergence of triploid L. guentherpetersi and its tetraploid hybrid. Distribution map of L. reevesii, L. guttata and L. guentherpetersi is modified after Grismer et al.. The map of Vietnam from https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cod-ab-vnm edited using QGIS 3.32 Software. Figures represent specific coloration of each species according to sex.

References

    1. Kearney, M., Fujita, M. K. & Ridenour, J. Lost sex in reptiles: Constraints and correlations. In Lost Sex: The Evolutionary Biology of Parthenogenesis (eds Schön, I. et al.) 447–474 (Springer Scientific, 2009). 10.1007/978-90-481-2770-2_21.
    1. Fyon, F., Berbel-Filho, W. M., Schlupp, I., Wild, G. & Úbeda, F. Why do hybrids turn down sex? Evolution77, 2186–2199. 10.1093/evolut/qpad129 (2023). - PubMed
    1. Sinclair, E. A., Pramuk, J. B., Bezy, R. L., Crandall, K. A. & Sites, J. W. Jr. DNA evidence for nonhybrid origins of parthenogenesis in natural populations of vertebrates. Evolution64, 1346–1357. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00893.x (2010). - PubMed
    1. Shimizu, Y., Shibata, N., Sakaizumi, M. & Yamashita, M. Production of diploid eggs through premeiotic endomitosis in the hybrid medaka between Oryzias latipes and O. curvinotus. Zool. Sci.17, 951–958. 10.2108/zsj.17.951 (2000).
    1. Marta, A. et al. Genetic and karyotype divergence between parents affect clonality and sterility in hybrids. eLife12, RP88366. 10.7554/eLife.88366.3 (2023). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources