Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):38.
doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03546-1.

Combined biochemical profiling and DNA sequencing in the expanded newborn screening for inherited metabolic diseases: the experience in an Italian reference center

Affiliations

Combined biochemical profiling and DNA sequencing in the expanded newborn screening for inherited metabolic diseases: the experience in an Italian reference center

Simona Fecarotta et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Newborn screening (NBS) programs have significantly improved the health and outcomes of patients with inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs). Methods based on liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis are viewed worldwide as the gold standard procedure for the expanded NBS programs for these disorders. Advanced molecular technologies point to genomic sequencing as an alternative and feasible strategy for the screening of genetic diseases, including IMDs. However, each of the two approaches has potential limitations when used as a first-tier analysis. In this study, we tested a workflow-based parallel biochemical and sequencing analyses to determine whether this approach could improve the diagnostic outcome.

Results: For each patient identified by LC-MS/MS as positive, we performed both the biochemical confirmatory tests and next-generation sequencing (NGS) procedures from the same Dried Blood Spot (DBS). NGS analysis was based on applying Exome Sequencing libraries, limiting the analysis to 105 actionable genes involved in IMDs. This allows overtaking the actual limitations of NBS on DBS, enhancing our capacity to identify variants that can drive a genetic disease. Through this approach, we could reach 100% of cases solved, with 37.9% of cases (41/108) for which the combination of the biochemical and NGS analysis was indispensable for a correct diagnosis. In total, we could identify 17 affected, 34 false positives, 12 individuals referred to us for maternal conditions. In 45 newborns the molecular analysis showed heterozygosity for mutations in one or more of the genes analyzed, with results compatible with the biochemical profile indicative of NBS positivity.

Conclusions: In this study, we validated the performance of the proposed workflow. The advantage of this approach is limiting molecular analysis only to positive newborns and using a restricted panel of 105 genes relevant for the expanded NBS, with a 100% rate of diagnosis and potential reduction of the costs related to NBS procedures and reduced impact on patients and families.

Keywords: Inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs); Newborn screening (NBS); Next-generation sequencing (NGS); Whole exome sequencing (WES).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: NBS for both biochemistry and genetics was performed according the Italian national law 167/2016 [9] Ethics approval from the local ethical committee (Campania 3) was also obtained: GENOMED study (nr. 3/2023). The research conformed to the principle of the Helsinki Declaration. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: Davide Cacchiarelli is the founder, shareholder, and consultant of NEGEDIA Srl. Sara Riccardo, Patrizia Annunziata, and Chiara Colantuono are employees of NEGEDIA Srl. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A standard procedures defined by Campania regional decree n. 30. Positive newborns are referred to the unit of Pediatric Metabolic Diseases for clinical evaluation and for confirmatory biochemical tests and, after evaluation of the results, molecular characterization. B The procedure followed in 108 consecutive newborns referred to us for NBS positivity. In these cases, biochemical and molecular analyses were run in parallel. While in the standard approach the molecular analysis is used as a confirmatory test after the biochemical evaluation, in our study molecular analysis was run in parallel with the biochemical testing. C Workflow of NGS and bioinformatic analysis. When both biochemical and molecular data were available, unless a situation of emergency required immediate evaluation and intervention, individual cases were assessed and discussed by a team of metabolic pediatricians and laboratory staff at the end of the procedure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A Pie chart representing the amount of case for which biochemical analysis was sufficient to assess the condition and the amount of cases for which NGS was necessary. On the right, barplot showing the percentage of NGS procedures improving or allowing the diagnosis. B Pie chart representing the incidence of each type of diagnosis respect to the total of analyzed infants. For each slice, a barplot represents the percentage of cases for which NGS was critical, helpful or biochemistry alone was sufficient

References

    1. Guthrie R, Susi A. a simple phenylalanine method for detecting phenylketonuria in large populations of newborn infants. Pediatrics. 1963;32:338–43. - PubMed
    1. Sikonja J, et al. Towards achieving equity and innovation in newborn screening across Europe. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022;8:31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones SA, et al. Application of a novel algorithm for expanding newborn screening for inherited metabolic disorders across Europe. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022;8:20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burlina A et al. A new approach to objectively evaluate inherited metabolic diseases for inclusion on newborn screening programmes. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2022;8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spiekerkoetter U, et al. Genomic newborn screening: Are we entering a new era of screening? J Inherit Metab Dis. 2023;46:778–95. - PubMed