Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 13;22(1):101.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph22010101.

Effectiveness of Global Postural Reeducation in Postural Changes and Postural Stability in Young Adults

Affiliations

Effectiveness of Global Postural Reeducation in Postural Changes and Postural Stability in Young Adults

Maria Paula Pacheco et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Postural changes are considered a public health issue and have gathered significant interest in both research and clinical practice.

Aims: To evaluate the effectiveness of Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) in improving postural changes and postural stability in healthy young adults. Additionally, this study aims to identify the main postural changes in the sample population.

Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted with a sample of students (n = 38) from the 2nd and 3rd years of undergraduate programs at Coimbra Health School, divided into an experimental group (EG) with 20 subjects and a control group (CG) with 18 subjects. The EG underwent a GPR intervention, while the CG received no intervention. Postural changes were assessed using a 3D motion analysis system (Qualisys), and stabilometry was evaluated using a Bertec force platform.

Results: At baseline (T0), the groups were homogeneous regarding sample characterization variables, as well as postural and stabilometric variables (p > 0.05). After four weeks of the intervention (T1), no significant differences were observed between the EG and CG for any of the variables studied (p > 0.05). However, within-group analysis for the experimental group revealed a significant difference (p = 0.04) in anterior-posterior velocity, indicating a reduction in this parameter from T0 to T1. In the control group, a significant difference was observed (p = 0.03) in the left knee valgus, indicating a reduction in valgus alignment.

Conclusions: GPR does not appear to be effective in improving postural changes or center of pressure displacement in healthy young students.

Keywords: Global Postural Reeducation; postural changes; postural stability; young adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Global Postural Reeducation Postures. Arrows indicate direction of movement and orange color represents the wall.

Similar articles

References

    1. Pastorelli F., Pasquetti P. Biomechanical analysis and rehabilitation in athletes. Clin. Cases Clin. Cases Min. Bone Metab. 2013;10:96. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huxham F.E., Goldie P.A., Patla A.E. Theoretical considerations in balance assessment. Aust. J. Physiother. 2001;47:89–100. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60300-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rougier P.R., Genthon N. Dynamical assessment of weight-bearing asymmetry during upright quiet stance in humans. Gait Posture. 2009;29:437–443. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.11.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roggio F., Ravalli S., Maugeri G., Bianco A., Palma A., Di Rosa M., Musumeci G. Technological advancements in the analysis of human motion and posture management through digital devices. World J. Orthop. 2021;12:467–484. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i7.467. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Das K., de Paula Oliveira T., Newell J. Comparison of markerless and marker-based motion capture systems using 95% functional limits of agreement in a linear mixed-effects modelling framework. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:22880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49360-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources