Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 10;12(1):77.
doi: 10.3390/children12010077.

Mapping the Gaps: A Scoping Review of Virtual Care Solutions for Caregivers of Children with Chronic Illnesses

Affiliations
Review

Mapping the Gaps: A Scoping Review of Virtual Care Solutions for Caregivers of Children with Chronic Illnesses

Nicole Pope et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Caregivers of children with chronic illnesses, including chronic pain, experience high levels of distress, which impacts their own mental and physical health as well as child outcomes. Virtual care solutions offer opportunities to provide accessible support, yet most overlook caregivers' needs. We conducted a scoping review to create an interactive Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) of virtual care solutions across a stepped care continuum (i.e., from self-directed to specialized care) for caregivers of youth with chronic illnesses. Methods: The review methodology was co-designed with four caregivers. Data sources were the peer-reviewed scientific literature and a call for innovations. Records were independently coded and assessed for quality. Results: Overall, 73 studies were included. Most virtual care solutions targeted caregivers of children with cancer, neurological disorders, and complex chronic illnesses. Over half were noted at lower levels of stepped care (i.e., self-guided apps and websites), with psychological strategies being predominant (84%). However, very few addressed caregivers' physical health (15%) or provided family counseling (19%) or practical support (1%). Significant gaps were noted in interventions for managing caregiver chronic pain, despite its high prevalence and impact on child outcomes. Conclusions: Evidence and Gap Maps are innovative visual tools for knowledge synthesis, facilitating rapid, evidence-informed decision-making for patients, families, health professionals, and policymakers. This EGM highlighted high-quality virtual care solutions ready for immediate scaling and identified critical evidence gaps requiring prioritization. To address the complexities of pediatric chronic illnesses, including chronic pain, virtual care initiatives must prioritize family-centered, accessible, and equitable approaches. Engaging caregivers as partners is critical to ensure interventions align with their needs and priorities.

Keywords: adolescents; children; chronic illnesses; chronic pain; evidence and gap map; primary caregivers; stepped care; virtual care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jennifer Stinson, the senior author of this manuscript, serves as a Section Board Member of Children. This role did not influence the representation or interpretation of the research results presented in this manuscript. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Levels of stepped care. Model adapted from Mental Health Commission of Canada, Newfoundland and Labrador Stepped Care 2.0 e-Mental Health Demonstration Project: Health Canada: 2019 [38].
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Virtual care solutions by stepped care levels.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Static version of the Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) showing the number and quality of included studies across the stepped care continuum and virtual care components. The rows represent the five levels of the stepped care continuum (Figure 1), and the columns depict the higher-order components of virtual care solutions. Each cell indicates the intersection of these two dimensions, with study counts and quality ratings displayed. A small legend is included below to clarify the structure of the figure. For a more comprehensive and interactive exploration, the EGM is available online at https://lab.research.sickkids.ca/iouch/caregivers/, accessed on 18 December 2024, where users can apply filters and sort data to suit their needs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chambers C.T., Dol J., Tutelman P.R., Langley C.L., Parker J.A., Cormier B.T., Macfarlane G.J., Jones G.T., Chapman D., Proudfoot N., et al. The prevalence of chronic pain in children and adolescents: A systematic review update and meta-analysis. PAIN. 2024;165:2215–2234. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003267. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hogan M.E., Taddio A., Katz J., Shah V., Krahn M. Incremental health care costs for chronic pain in Ontario, Canada: A population-based matched cohort study of adolescents and adults using administrative data. PAIN. 2016;157:1626–1633. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000561. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murray C.B., Groenewald C.B., de la Vega R., Palermo T.M. Long-term impact of adolescent chronic pain on young adult educational, vocational, and social outcomes. PAIN. 2020;161:439–445. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001732. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faltyn M., Cresswell L., Van Lieshout R.J. Psychological problems in parents of children and adolescents with chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Health Med. 2021;26:298–312. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1778756. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beveridge J., Noel M., Soltani S., Neville A., Orr S., Madigan S., Birnie K. The association between parent mental health and pediatric chronic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PAIN. 2023;165:997–1012. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003125. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources