Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 9;17(2):193.
doi: 10.3390/cancers17020193.

Anal Cancer Screening: 10-Year Experience of a Specialized Outpatient Clinic

Affiliations

Anal Cancer Screening: 10-Year Experience of a Specialized Outpatient Clinic

Iolanda Espirito Santo et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

In 2012, the Department of Visceral Surgery of the Lausanne University Hospital CHUV implemented a dedicated high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) outpatient clinic for surveillance and follow-up purposes. This 10-year longitudinal study analyzed 537 patients (2214 visits) using a structured screening protocol. Dysplastic lesions were detected in 49% of patients, predominantly low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs, 74%). Among LSIL cases, 6% progressed to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) within 24 months, reaching 25% cumulative progression at 36 months. Of HSIL patients, 3% developed carcinoma in situ after 48 months. Notably, no invasive carcinoma was observed during the follow-up. Four patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma at initial screening were treated with chemoradiotherapy, and one required salvage surgery. Independent risk factors for the presence of higher-stage precancerous lesions (≥HSILs) were the presence of high-risk HPV genotypes (OR 14.5, 95% CI 5-42.2, p < 0.001), detectable HIV viral load (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.8-16.7, p = 0.003), and symptoms at the first screening visit (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.1-9.9, p = 0.04). HIV-positive status was associated with a trend towards an increased risk of progression (OR 2.79, p = 0.073). These findings highlight the importance of systematic follow-up and early intervention in high-risk populations to prevent anal cancer progression.

Keywords: HIV; HPV testing; MSM; algorithm; anal cancer; anal dysplasia; high-resolution anoscopy; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient referrals to the institutional HRA clinic. HRA—high-resolution anoscopy. Others include referring surgeons and local emergency departments.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Multinominal logistic regression analysis of risk factors for higher-stage lesions (≥HSILs). Displayed are odds ratios (black squares) with 95% confidence intervals (black bars). Two error bars are clipped at the axis limit. Charlson—Charlson Comorbidity Index, MSM—men who have sex with men, HIV—human immunodeficiency virus, HR-HPV—presence of high-risk human papillomavirus genotypes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Histopathological findings during the first screening visit and progression rates during follow-up. LSIL—low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL—high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cumulative risk of disease progression from LSIL to HSIL (red) and from HSIL to carcinoma in situ (green). LSIL—low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; HSIL—high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Institutional algorithm for HRA follow-up and treatment. HRA—high-resolution anoscopy, HPV—human papillomavirus, HIV—human immunodeficiency virus, HSIL—high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, LSIL—low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rao S., Guren M.G., Khan K., Brown G., Renehan A.G., Steigen S.E., Deutsch E., Martinelli E., Arnold D. Anal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2021;32:1087–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deshmukh A.A., Suk R., Shiels M.S., Damgacioglu H., Lin Y.Y., Stier E.A., Nyitray A.G., Chiao E.Y., Nemutlu G.S., Chhatwal J., et al. Incidence Trends and Burden of Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancers Among Women in the United States, 2001–2017. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2021;113:792–796. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa128. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ward Z.J., Gaba Q., Atun R. Cancer incidence and survival for 11 cancers in the Commonwealth: A simulation-based modelling study. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25:1127–1134. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00336-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sung H., Jiang C., Bandi P., Minihan A., Fidler-Benaoudia M., Islami F., Siegel R.L., Jemal A. Differences in cancer rates among adults born between 1920 and 1990 in the USA: An analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet Public Health. 2024;9:e583–e593. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00156-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Islami F., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Bray F., Jemal A. International trends in anal cancer incidence rates. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017;46:924–938. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw276. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources