Impairment of Microcirculation Parameters in Patients with a History of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
- PMID: 39858984
- PMCID: PMC11766654
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010002
Impairment of Microcirculation Parameters in Patients with a History of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Abstract
Background and Objectives: According to the International Working Group on Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) risk classification, the estimated risk of developing a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is much higher in patients with a history of DFUs (Grade 3) compared to those with a peripheral neuropathy but without a history of DFUs (Grades 1 and 2). It has been suggested that microcirculation impairment is involved in DFU genesis and could be taken into account to refine the existing risk classification. The aim of this study was to evaluate microcirculation parameters in patients with diabetes according to their estimated DFU risk. Materials and Methods: A total of 172 patients with type 2 diabetes associated with a peripheral neuropathy and/or a history of DFUs were included and classified into two groups (Grade 1-2 and Grade 3) according to the IWGDF classification. All patients underwent an evaluation of peripheral neuropathy, plantar sudomotor function, and skin microcirculation parameters. These different parameters were compared between both groups. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, diabetes duration, transcutaneous oxygen pressure level, skin microcirculatory reactivity, neuropathy disability score, neuropathy symptom score, or thermal sensitivity. Patients in Grade 3 were more likely to present with retinopathy (OR 3.15, 95%CI [1.53; 6.49]) and severe sudomotor dysfunction (OR 2.73 95%CI [1.29; 5.80] but less likely to have abnormal VPT (OR 0.20 95%CI [0.05; 0.80]). Conclusions: The present study found more retinopathy and a more pronounced alteration to sudomotor function in Grade 3 patients, suggesting that these parameters could be considered to better identify patients at high risk of DFUs.
Keywords: diabetic foot; microcirculation; neuropathy; sudomotor function.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Manu C., Lacopi E., Bouillet B., Vouillarmet J., Ahluwalia R., Lüdemann C., Garcia-Klepzig J.L., Meloni M., De Buruaga V.R., Sánchez-Ríos J.P., et al. Delayed referral of patients with diabetic foot ulcers across Europe: Patterns between primary care and specialised units. J. Wound Care. 2018;27:186–192. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.3.186. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Apelqvist J., Bakker K., van Houtum W.H., Nabuurs-Franssen M.H., Schaper N.C. International consensus and practical guidelines on the management and the prevention of the diabetic foot. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2000;16((Suppl. S1)):S84–S92. doi: 10.1002/1520-7560(200009/10)16:1+<::AID-DMRR113>3.0.CO;2-S. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chabbert-Buffet N., LeDevehat C., Khodabandhelou T., Allaire E., Gaitz J.P., Tribout L., Abdoucheli-Baudot N., Vayssairat M. Evidence for associated cutaneous microangiopathy in diabetic patients with neuropathic foot ulceration. Lett. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:960–961. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.960. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
