Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jan 13;61(1):103.
doi: 10.3390/medicina61010103.

Myocardial Infarction-Associated Shock: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phenotypes, SCAI Classification, and Outcome Assessment

Affiliations
Observational Study

Myocardial Infarction-Associated Shock: A Comprehensive Analysis of Phenotypes, SCAI Classification, and Outcome Assessment

Stanislav Dil et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objectives: In-hospital mortality associated with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (MI-CS) remains critically high. A particularly challenging form, mixed shock (MS), combines features of cardiogenic shock (CS) with distributive elements such as vasodilation and reduced vascular resistance. MS is associated with elevated mortality rates and presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study aimed to analyze the clinical, historical, instrumental, and laboratory characteristics of the primary phenotypes of MI-CS, stratified according to the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock severity scale. Materials and Methods: In this single-center, retrospective observational study, we reviewed the medical records of 1289 patients admitted to the emergency cardiology department from 1 January to 12 December 2020. Among them, 117 patients were identified as having MI-CS and were divided into two groups: MS (n = 48) and isolated CS (n = 69). The data were analyzed using the SCAI shock classification. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify predictors of mortality and improved survival outcomes. Results: Patients with MS were older (80 years [71.0; 83.0] vs. 73 years [64.0; 81.0], p = 0.035). The overall mortality rate was significantly higher in the MS group (68% vs. 53%, RR = 1.438, 95% CI: 1.041-1.986, p = 0.03). Logistic regression identified mechanical ventilation (OR = 8.33, 95% CI: 2.54-22.80, p = 0.012), elevated lactate levels (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02-1.41, p = 0.026), and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (OR = 7.97, 95% CI: 2.51-24.40, p < 0.0001) as independent predictors of mortality. Conversely, the use of an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.06-0.80, p = 0.021) and a higher body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.99, p = 0.038) were associated with reduced mortality risk. Conclusions: MS in the context of MI-CS represents a distinct clinical phenotype with specific hemodynamic features and significantly worsened outcomes. The identification of mortality predictors, such as mechanical ventilation, elevated lactate levels, and CPR, alongside protective factors like IABP use and a higher BMI, underscores the importance of early and tailored therapeutic interventions. These findings highlight the need for further studies to refine treatment protocols and improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Keywords: cardiogenic shock; mixed shock; myocardial infarction-associated shock; systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work described in this article. The work was carried out without the involvement of grants or financial support from public, non-profit, or commercial organizations.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prevalence of MI-CS phenotypes among patients admitted to intensive care unit.

References

    1. van Diepen S., Katz J.N., Albert N.M., Henry T.D., Jacobs A.K., Kapur N.K., Kilic A., Menon V., Ohman E.M., Sweitzer N.K., et al. Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136:E232–E268. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harjola V.P., Lassus J., Sionis A., Køber L., Tarvasmäki T., Spinar J., Parissis J., Banaszewski M., Silva-Cardoso J., Carubelli V., et al. Clinical picture and risk prediction of short-term mortality in cardiogenic shock: Clinical picture and outcome of cardiogenic shock. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2015;17:501–509. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.260. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thangam M., Luke A.A., Johnson D.Y., Amin A.P., Lasala J., Huang K., Maddox K.E.J. Sociodemographic differences in utilization and outcomes for temporary cardiovascular mechanical support in the setting of cardiogenic shock. Am. Heart J. 2021;236:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.12.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ni Hici T., Boardman H.M., Baig K., Stafford J.L., Cernei C., Bodger O., Westaby S. Mechanical assist devices for acute cardiogenic shock. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020:CD013002. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stretch R., Sauer C.M., Yuh D.D., Bonde P. National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: Incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014;64:1407–1415. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.958. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources