Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 17;26(2):777.
doi: 10.3390/ijms26020777.

Botulinum Toxin: A Comprehensive Review of Its Molecular Architecture and Mechanistic Action

Affiliations
Review

Botulinum Toxin: A Comprehensive Review of Its Molecular Architecture and Mechanistic Action

Raj Kumar et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Botulinum toxin (BoNT), the most potent substance known to humans, likely evolved not to kill but to serve other biological purposes. While its use in cosmetic applications is well known, its medical utility has become increasingly significant due to the intricacies of its structure and function. The toxin's structural complexity enables it to target specific cellular processes with remarkable precision, making it an invaluable tool in both basic and applied biomedical research. BoNT's potency stems from its unique structural features, which include domains responsible for receptor recognition, membrane binding, internalization, and enzymatic cleavage. This division of labor within the toxin's structure allows it to specifically recognize and interact with synaptic proteins, leading to precise cleavage at targeted sites within neurons. The toxin's mechanism of action involves a multi-step process: recognition, binding, and catalysis, ultimately blocking neurotransmitter release by cleaving proteins like SNAP-25, VAMP, and syntaxin. This disruption in synaptic vesicle fusion causes paralysis, typically in peripheral neurons. However, emerging evidence suggests that BoNT also affects the central nervous system (CNS), influencing presynaptic functions and distant neuronal systems. The evolutionary history of BoNT reveals that its neurotoxic properties likely provided a selective advantage in certain ecological contexts. Interestingly, the very features that make BoNT a potent toxin also enable its therapeutic applications, offering precision in treating neurological disorders like dystonia, spasticity, and chronic pain. In this review, we highlight the toxin's structural, functional, and evolutionary aspects, explore its clinical uses, and identify key research gaps, such as BoNT's central effects and its long-term cellular impact. A clear understanding of these aspects could facilitate the representation of BoNT as a unique scientific paradigm for studying neuronal processes and developing targeted therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: Bacillus sp.; BoNT/NTNHA-like component A; Clostridiaceae; Clostridium family; E-cadherin; SNAP-23; SNAP-25; SNARE proteins; TNF; botulinum neurotoxin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Different forms of botulinum complexes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure and Components of the Botulinum Toxin A Complex. (A) The domains of Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) are illustrated. The 150 kDa BoNT/A consists of a light chain (LC), heavy chain (HC), and the translocation domain. The active site is indicated, highlighting the critical zinc-binding site and the hydrolysis mechanism essential for the neurotoxin’s proteolytic activity. (B) Schematic representation of Botulinum toxin complex A. This includes the BoNT/A protein and its associated neurotoxin-associated proteins (NAPs). The figure distinguishes between HA+/Orf- and HA-/Orf+ gene clusters, highlighting their distinct genetic organization and the resulting functional properties of the toxin complex. The role of HA proteins in the toxin’s stability and OrfX’s potential regulatory functions are also depicted.

References

    1. Smith T.J., Hill K.K., Raphael B.H. Historical and current perspectives on Clostridium botulinum diversity. Res. Microbiol. 2015;166:290–302. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.09.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hill K.K., Smith T.J. Genetic diversity within Clostridium botulinum serotypes, botulinum neurotoxin gene clusters and toxin subtypes. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2013;364:1–20. - PubMed
    1. Kumar R., Chang T.W., Singh B.R. Evolutionary traits of toxins. In: Goparlakrishnakone P., editor. Biological Toxins and Bioterrorism. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2015. - DOI
    1. Sebaihia M., Peck M.W., Minton N.P., Thomson N.R., Holden M.T., Mitchell W.J., Carter A.T., Bentley S.D., Mason D.R., Crossman L., et al. Genome sequence of a proteolytic (Group I) Clostridium botulinum strain Hall A and comparative analysis of the clostridial genomes. Genome Res. 2007;17:1082–1092. doi: 10.1101/gr.6282807. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fairweather N.F., Lyness V.A., Pickyard D.J., Allen G., Thomson R.O. Cloning, nucleotide sequencing and expression of tetanus toxin fragment C in Eschericia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1986;165:21–27. doi: 10.1128/jb.165.1.21-27.1986. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources